Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 4,049
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2015, 12:35 pm
In last week's opinion in Obergefell v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
In the brand-new Court of Appeal decision just out - Actavis UK Ltd & Others v Eli Lilly & Company [2015] EWCA Civ 555 (25 June 2015), Lord Justice Floyd (Lords Justices Kitchin and Longmore concurring) disagreed with Arnold J on two main issues. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 6:40 am
Tax, of course, was the driving factor in one of two same sex marriage cases United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:34 am
According to this approach, Smith & Nephew’s product (which contains 0.77% binding agent) would fall within the scope of the claim.Smith & Nephew, on the other hand, argued that the limits of the claimed range were precisely as they were stated (i.e. a concentration of 0.999% would not fall within the scope of the claim). [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:19 pm
Kennedy announced the Court's 5-4 ruling making same-sex marriage lawful in every state in the United States of America. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:39 am
Supreme Court Rank was granted leave to appeal by the Supreme Court and the case was heard by Lord Neuberger, Lord Reed, Lord Carnwath, Lord Toulson and Lord Hodge on 21 April 2015, which can be viewed on demand on the Supreme Court’s website. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
In the admirably brief Court of Appeal decision just out - Actavis UK Ltd & Others v Eli Lilly & Company [2015] EWCA Civ 555 (25 June 2015) , Lord Justice Floyd (Lord Justice Kitchin and Lord Justice Longmore concurring) disagreed with Arnold J on two main issues - one on which nothing turns in the end (although it has important wider significance), and one which has the result that this case seems set to run and run.The claimBut let's recap a… [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:24 pm
With its decision in King v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 6:12 am
Yesterday the Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Kitchin, Briggs and Christopher Clarke), at [2015] EWCA Civ 607 , allowed ConvaTec's appeal and dismissed Smith & Nephew's cross-appeal. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 12:55 pm
A few years ago, after a major inventorying project, the Law Library’s collection of United States Court of Appeals Records and Briefs was sentto our state-of-the-art off-site storage at Fort Meade for safekeeping. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 7:43 am
Thus in Pham v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:26 am
TN & MA (Afghanistan) (AP) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 2-5 March 2015. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
United States? [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 2:59 am
In delivering the judgment Lord Sumption stated that the Court of Appeal authority Borneman v Wilson (1884) 28 Ch D 53 suggests that a trustee in bankruptcy must either adopt proceedings in their entirety or not at all, even where there are discrete prior proceedings conducted by the bankrupt before his appointment. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 2:27 am
In delivering the judgment Lord Mance stated that adjudication is intended to be a speedy provisional measure, pending final determination. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:22 am
., United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 11:04 pm
However, in the famous case of Street v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 4:09 pm
However, it was not stated whether journalists will have the right to argue against the disclosure of phone records. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Lord Sumption, referring to Lord Hoffmann’s speech in Matadeen v Pointu [1999] 1 AC 98 and that of Baroness Hale in Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] 2 AC 557, stated that the principle of equality was “not a principle special to the jurisprudence of the European Union. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:48 am
Lord Sumption stated that in establishing whether the scheme was abusive it must first be shown that the transactions concerned resulted in a tax advantage which would be contrary to the purpose of the conditions laid down in the relevant EU Directive. [read post]
