Search for: "Matter of Wright"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 2,152
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2024, 11:30 pm
READ MORE Get the Latest 5G Devices For the Front LinesGet the Latest 5G Devices For the Front Lines Stay connected when it matters most with Verizon Frontline. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 9:33 am
In its § 256(a) petition, Egenera asked the PTO as a matter of formality “to delete Peter Schulter as an inventor of the invention being claimed. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:35 am
Wright, 391 S.C. 436, 706 S.E.2d 324 (South Carolina Supreme Court 2011) (quoting Katz v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:13 am
For over two years now, I’ve been writing about the crisis as it has unfolded, and now instead of reading about it on Mandelman Matters, I hope you’ll come out to hear me tell the story of the meltdown so that anybody can understand how we got to where we are today, and why homeowners have always been much more the victims… than the villains. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 12:58 pm
At Oral Argument Arguing Counsel J.Philip Calabrese, Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP, Columbus, for Appellant Huntington Bank Ronald R. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
Notwithstanding these efforts to make a federal case out of the matter, the question of whether a state can require, forbid, or permit state and local governmental assistance to the feds in immigration enforcement is really up to each state and its own laws. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
. because the matter was an intra-branch dispute between a subordinate and superior officer of the Executive Branch. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:57 pm
Nor do most people for that matter. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 8:41 am
AVCO Community Developers, Inc. (1974) 40 Cal.App.3d 513, 521 [where no issue of fact is presented, appellate court determines whether the granting of the preliminary injunction was error as a matter of law].)II. [read post]
23 May 2013, 9:01 pm
They described how, today, administrative agencies “as a practical matter . . . exercise legislative power, . . . executive power . . . and judicial power. . . [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 4:22 am
” Paul Adams and George Wright report for BBC News. [read post]
14 Dec 2004, 5:06 am
Wright, 497 U.S. 805 (1990). [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:01 pm
But even as the lawsuit seeks to attach some legal flesh onto the political bones of the dispute, the litigation also highlights two recurring problems with the debate so far: (1) the term “sanctuary” is too broad, as a legal matter, insofar as it is used as an umbrella to cover many state and local actions that are very different (legally speaking) from one another; and (2) the legal positions advanced by the federal administration and ambitious states like California are both… [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm
Last year at the Supreme Court, there was some level of drama about who would win or lose what I (and many other analysts) thought were the major cases; most people expected Justice Kennedy to join (as he did) with the more liberal Justices to recognize a national right of marriage equality for same-sex couples, but folks were less confident about the results in the Obamacare tax subsidies case and the challenge to Arizona’s independent redistricting commission, to name just a few. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm
There is good authority (at least in the US Courts of Appeals) that “shall issue” means “must issue,” and since Governor Ducey has failed to start the vacancy-filling election machinery by issuing election writs, he has flouted his responsibilities under the plain language of the Amendment.Whether, when he does issue election writs, he can abide by the November 2020 date for a vacancy-filling election embodied in Arizona law is a tougher matter. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
But neither of those observations addresses the key question in this case: what, if anything, in the federal Constitution interferes with a state’s control over its subdivisions, which control is ordinarily a matter reserved for state law? [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
It is often (and rightly) said today that there are many people and forces working to divide America. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Indeed, Justice Ginsburg went out of her way to decide the Arizona matter on the basis of a broad constitutional reading of “Legislature” in the Elections Clause, when she very well could have simply held that a congressional statute on the books authorized the Arizona voters to do what they did. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:01 pm
It should also be obvious that, in an operation as far-flung as the federal government, deciding what the precise contours of particular appropriations laws are—and whether the executive branch’s expenditures fall within them—can be very complicated and statute-specific business.When the case goes up the appellate ladder, these questions may consume a great deal of time and attention, but only if the higher courts first agree with the district court on a threshold… [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 6:17 am
Wright, 300 N.C. 83 (1980), overruled on other grounds by McBride v. [read post]
