Search for: "Scaling v. State" Results 1661 - 1680 of 4,700
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2022, 10:52 am by ernst
 It's now out in print, from the Cambridge University Press: Mark V. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:12 am
 This weblog has not been uniformly impressed with FIFA's intellectual property activities over the years (see eg "Fifa scandal: the sponsors awaken", here; "FIFA's unfair catenaccio on World Cup's IP", here; "Ferrero v FIFA (in the World Cup trade mark dispute) -- 1:0 says the German BGH", here; "Put those vuvuzelas away, here comes FIFA", here; "Pants off in Anti-Ambush Marketing Frenzy", here; "Ferrero 5… [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:42 am by Ilya Shapiro - Guest
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 5:30 pm by Rory Little
Meanwhile, modern precedents such as the Court’s 1971 decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 12:00 pm by Guest Blogger
The Court largely endorsed that logic two terms back in Harris v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 2:01 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Perhaps the most important exclusion from patentability, discussed further below, is India’s Section 3(d).The authors cited Pfizer v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 2:44 am by Chukwuma Okoli
In this regard, the UK Supreme Court’s recent landmark decisions in Vedanta v Lungowe and Okpabi v Shell have granted jurisdiction and allowed such claims to proceed on the merits in the English courts. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Richard Zelichov and Trevor T. Garmey
  After all, Covid-19 was the first global pandemic since 1919, and the conflict in Ukraine marks the first large-scale conventional conflict in Europe since World War II. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 5:11 pm by Guest Author
Moreover, as we explain in our article, Camden evaluated governmental power using a sliding scale. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm by NL
A personal status did not need to be immutable or innate (Clift v the United Kingdom no 7205/07 July 2010 and A, and Others v the United Kingdom [GC] no 3455/05 ECHR 2009). 5. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm by NL
A personal status did not need to be immutable or innate (Clift v the United Kingdom no 7205/07 July 2010 and A, and Others v the United Kingdom [GC] no 3455/05 ECHR 2009). 5. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 2:36 pm by Scott Hervey
   Three academic publishers filed suit against Georgia State University claiming that the University infringed their copyrights by maintaining a policy which allows GSU professors to make digital copies of excerpts of their books available to students without paying them a royalty. [read post]