Search for: "Smith v. Judges"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 5,943
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2018, 6:40 am
Smith v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 3:12 am
In a decision that only a legal apologist or circuit judge could love, the 8th Circuit in U.S. v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 9:18 pm
Mr Justice Marcus Smith--the UK's top antitrust-specialized judge (President of the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CATribunal or just CAT)) as well as a technically savvy patent judge--has indeed assigned the highest possible priority to the adjudication of Microsoft's appeal of the Competition & Markets Authority's (CMA) attempt to block Microsoft's acquisition of Activision Blizzard King (ABK, NASDAQ:ATVI). [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm
In his majority opinion, Judge Smith wrote that the Administrative Procedure Act does not "require[] the Secretary to remove any alien or to alter his enforcement priorities," and he quoted with approval "the Supreme Court’s description, in [Reno v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In Alleyne v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 3:35 am
The Northern District's own Judge Zagel will be a featured speaker. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm
Randy Smith and R. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm
R v Smith, heard 16 June 2011. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 3:25 pm
Judge Jerry Smith affirmed a dismissal of a habeas corpus petition. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 5:19 pm
E.g., Smith & Nephew, Inc.v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:17 pm
Judge Davis cited Sosa v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:00 pm
., Goddard v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 4:47 pm
Since failure to abide by the requirements of Hines is all too common a problem it is perhaps hopeful that in a concurring decision Judge Smith wrote thatToday's decision correctly applies People v Hines (97 NY2d 56, 61-62 [2001]). [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:09 am
Smith, 574 F.2d 882, 883 (CA6 1978) (traveling alone), with United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:31 am
In Herrera v. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Sweigart v. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 5:58 am
However, despite the seemingly unfair position that Oriental found itself in as a result of Smith J's decision, the Court of Appeal was unpersuaded that the judge's discretion had been exercised on an incorrect basis or that he had taken irrelevant considerations into account. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 3:00 am
In the case of Dailey v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 9:30 am
Smith, joined by Judges Reinhardt and Paez. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 11:45 am
Smith v. [read post]
