Search for: "State v. Congress" Results 1661 - 1680 of 29,271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2010, 11:49 pm by Steve Vladeck
Congress gave each state the choice to establish a protection and advocacy system as either an independent state agency or a private not-for-profit entity. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am by Alex Loomis
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided Ziglar v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am by Alex Loomis
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided Ziglar v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 6:35 pm
Congress seeks to enforce them in United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
Congress justified the exclusion of Southern representatives by the suspension of Southern states’ “political relations in the Union” during the war; such suspensions continued until Congress restored them. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:52 pm by Priscilla Smith
Uncritical deference to Congress’ factual findings in these cases is inappropriate. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 10:50 am
The State has filed the final brief in the "ceded lands" case, Hawaii v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 3:53 pm by zshapiro
While some of the Circuit judges wanted to base the decision on Toten the majority instead based the decision on United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 2:52 am by Eugene Kontorovich
IV, sec. 3 clearly forbids the creating a new state in the territory of an existing one without the latter’s consent, and the consent of Congress. [read post]
1 May 2007, 11:07 am
Robert Brown in which Brown claims that Congress intended as part of the disclosure focus of the securities laws to also cover corporate governance. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 10:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Grimaldi and saying it's what Congress understands the Lanham Act to mean. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
This is the first in a series of posts on United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 11:44 am by Rory Little
United States), that the Justices were simply tired from the first argument, in Yates v. [read post]