Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 9,084
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2016, 11:50 am
State, 659 So.2d 235, 238 (Florida Supreme Court 1995); Goudy v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:09 am
The post Court releases April argument calendar appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
And in First American Financial Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:18 pm
The panel majority concluded that the California Supreme Court would interpret its free speech clause by relying on federal judicial interpretations of the First Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 10:59 pm
The First (People v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 6:19 am
Oliveira v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 11:45 am
On December 20, 2018, the Third District issued its decision in County of Butte v. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 12:34 pm
Hannah Lauck of the Eastern District of Virginia recently handed down the long-awaited opinion in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 3:56 pm
However, as Molina-Martinez v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:08 am
On December 22, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 12:29 pm
As the court explained in Ex parte United States, that authority allows the justices to issue writs directly to district courts, even in cases in which any appeal from the district court must first go to a court of appeals. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 7:09 pm
” Zadvidas v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:18 am
Lacking legal authority to guide its decision, this Court must, as defense counsel stated at the hearing, rely on common sense. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
While there is a so-called “political question” doctrine, first established in Luther v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:34 am
First, regarding residence in Texas, the District Court took judicial notice of the United States census data that the relocation rate of American citizens of all ages and races out of Texas was about 5.2% between 2007 and 2009—the relevant time period. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 8:52 am
First, the district court reasoned that the erosion to Sequenom’s price and its loss of market share were not irreparable. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 8:56 pm
In the first case to reach the Supreme Court, Buchanan v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:09 pm
The District Court certified two questions, and only one was answered by the Maine Supreme Judicial Court (the second was deemed moot based on the answer to the first question). [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 3:36 am
The First Circuit's opinion in Hutchinson v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 6:04 pm
First, the Court set out the underlying concept that state and federal criminal systems are equal and require mutual respect. [read post]
