Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2014, 7:11 am
Moohan & Anor v The Lord Advocate, heard 24 July 2014. [read post]
10 Jun 2025, 3:26 am
Notable examples include Kneschke v. [read post]
11 Jun 2025, 11:07 pm
Notable examples include Kneschke v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 1:00 am
The proposed panel for hand down is Lady Hale, Lord Reed, and Lord Hodge. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
The proposed panel for hand down is Lady Hale, Lord Reed and Lord Kerr. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
SG resisted the application to amend the patent, stating that it would not be ready to deal with the application. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 11:59 am
The House of Lords however, in Twinsectra Ltd v Yardley, [2002] 2 AC 164, complicated matters. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:19 pm
Lords Ins. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 10:26 am
So it is with the arbitration contract, which the UK Supreme Court has discussed at length in its recent judgment in Jivraj v Hashwani. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 10:01 pm
Spain kept not only Texas, but western territories that today comprise much of the states of Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming.... 1774, in London, England, at the conclusion of 2-1/2 weeks of proceedings in the case captioned Donaldson v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 2:16 am
They reiterate largely what has been stated to be his position to the Scottish parliament. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 10:58 am
” The Act states that the signature may be an electronic signature. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 1:00 am
Accordingly, as recently summarised by Lord Justice Arnold, the three key considerations for claim interpretation in the UK are 1) the wording of the claim, 2) the context provided by the specification and 3) the inventor’s purpose (InterDigital v Lenovo [2023] EWCA Civ 105). [read post]
17 May 2016, 3:34 pm
The value of this secondary evidence (as opposed to primary expert evidence ) was discussed at length by Lord Justice Jacob in Nichia v Argos [2007] EWCA Civ 741. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:05 pm
Lord Sumption JSC explaining at [19] that, the rule originated in the division between the functions of judge and jury, the question of libel or no libel being exclusively for the jury. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 3:13 am
Lord Briggs dissented. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 4:39 am
The full list of links can be found here. 18 June | FA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: New immigration and asylum judgment from the Administrative Court; new problems for the Government with implementation of a European Directive 17 June | Government shelves Equality Act timetable: From Out-law.com 17 June | Control orders: a balancing act between human rights and national security: Joshua Rozenberg comments on two recent Supreme Court judgments 17 June |… [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 7:28 am
The source stated that the police officer “could be” the claimant and that he had reported this to the police. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 6:17 am
Ignatius Yordan Nugraha, Strasbourg Observers: Consolidating the legal recognition and protection of same-sex couples: Koilova and Babulkova v Bulgaria. [read post]
2 May 2010, 1:36 am
The case was referred to the ECJ by the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) in 2008 (M, R (on the application of) v Her Majesty’s Treasury [2008] UKHL 26). [read post]
