Search for: "Sullivan v. Sullivan*"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 4,162
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
Removal of a public officer from his or her officeKalodukas v Berentsen, 2014 NY Slip Op 07406, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentGlenda Kalodukas and other citizen residents of the Village of Bloomingburg in Sullivan County [Kalodukas], filed a petition in the Appellate Division pursuant to Public Officers Law §36* seeking to have the Appellate Division remove Mark Berentsen from his position of Mayor of the Village, alleging, among other things, that he violated General… [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 5:25 am
This case holds that a factfinder may may determine that a restaurant at the Resorts World Casino had to notify employees that it was shutting down because it was sufficiently distinct from the Casino and therefore fell within the WARN Act.The case is Roberts v. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 6:03 am
The Conscious Uncoupling of UK and EU Intellectual Property Law," will be hosted in-person at UCL and live streamed.The speakers include Dr Ruth Fox (Director of the Hansard Society), Professor Phillip Johnson (University of Cardiff) and Nina O’Sullivan (Mishcon de Reya LLP). [read post]
27 May 2020, 9:08 am
One is allowed to proceed with her case, but the other case is dismissed for good.The case is Creese v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
The Town Attorney had concluded that Town Law §81 did not permit a referendum concerning term limits.Finding that there was no statutory basis for a public referendum on this particular issue, the Appellate Division ruled that Plaintiffs' petition failed to adequately allege a clear legal right to the relief Plaintiffs sought and sustained the Supreme Court's granting the Respondents' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' petition for failure to state a cause of actionThe Appellate… [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:15 pm
In the 1964 case New York Times v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 6:56 am
The Court of Appeals reverses.The case is Nastri v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 5:00 am
Williamson ruled that a claim against a truck driver's employer for negligent hiring, retention, supervision or entrustment cannot stand in the absence of a related claim for punitive damages.In the case of Sullivan v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
This means the plaintiff did not engage in protected speech under the First Amendment, and he cannot redress what he calls his retaliatory termination.The case is Shara v. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 12:01 pm
In McCann v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 6:53 am
The Court says that while inmates must exhaust this administrative remedy, they do not have to wait for the jailers to take their sweet time in resolving the grievances before they can file suit.The case is Hayes v. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 7:31 am
Siegelberg, Statelessness: A Modern History Jan Klabbers, reviewing Jens Steffek, International Organization as Technocratic Utopia Alexandra Hofer, reviewing Gavin Sullivan, The Law of the List: UN Counterterrorism Sanctions and the Politics of Global Security Law Paolo Palchetti, reviewing Hadi Azari, La demande reconventionnelle devant la Cour internationale de Justice Ingo Venzke, reviewing Sigrid Boysen, Die postkoloniale Konstellation: Natürliche Ressourcen und das… [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 7:21 am
Philadelphia Skyline In the case of Watson v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 8:03 am
This case would be included in any textbook on appellate practice, as it raises a rare issue that only an appellate maven would love.The case is Bey v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 5:57 am
Sullivan, and the only other way to change libel laws would be to amend the Constitution. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 12:42 pm
Sullivan. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 6:00 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York in Greenlight Capital LP v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 10:54 am
" EFF is represented by law firms Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz, LLP and Jassy Vick Carolan. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 2:58 pm
Related Issues: Free SpeechBloggers' RightsRelated Cases: Elonis v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:37 am
Plaintiff loses the case.The case is Tripathy v. [read post]
