Search for: "US v. Givens" Results 1661 - 1680 of 51,335
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2024, 6:33 am by centerforartlaw
Given the rapid growth of the Chinese art market, we have reasons to ask if incentives for looting are now increasingly offered by wealthy buyers within China. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
The use of Rule 1.8.5 raises other concerns. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:15 am by CMS
Where an expert has been given a sufficient opportunity to respond to criticism of, or otherwise clarify his or her report, for example, through questions under CPR Part 35.6. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 2:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As a threshold matter, for those less familiar with Section 533, a brief overview may be useful. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am by Daniel J. Gilman
  The agencies have given me much to kvetch about (thanks?). [read post]
While no recorded dissent or explanation was given by the Supreme Court, the 11th Circuit Court cited the Supreme Court opinion in Glossip v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:06 am by Rob Robinson
That same year, in Caratube v Kazakhstan, confidential information was leaked from the Kazakh government’s IT system and the claimant eventually obtained some of the leaked documents. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 3:43 am by SHG
They did it to us so we’re going to do it to them and see how they like it. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 12:53 am by David Pocklington
With regard to his status as a campaigner against Pride and the use of the Pride and Progress Pride flag, the Acting Chancellor referred to his original decision in which he took the relevant law on the question of standing from Walton v Scottish Ministers [2012] UKSC 44. at [92] and [94]. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm
An unfortunate coincidence revealed the limits to the algorithm in May 2022 when, a week after news leaked that the Supreme Court was poised to strike down Roe v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 10:14 am by Eric Goldman
Sawabeh Employee’s Claims Against Employer for Unauthorized Use of Social Media Accounts Move Forward–Maremont v. [read post]