Search for: "United States v. Holder"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 4,280
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
Supreme Court considered the material support prohibition in Holder v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 4:39 am
Whether or not a company in the business of selling and administering workers' compensation insurance makes money is the product of two basic components: investment income from the money it holds in trust for policy holders; and, relatedly, keeping expenses down (i.e. not paying claims it isn't required to).There is a long succession of cases out of the United States Supreme Court evolving the rights of corporations. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 1:20 am
One still has to appreciate that the copyright holder can at any time reassert their rights, and thus the copyright in the works is newly resurrected (although, as evident from the above, was never gone to begin with).Our cousins in the United States do accept the abandonment of copyrights in works. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
Otah requested a bond hearing while he awaited removal from the United States and while his Petition for Review (PFR) was pending with the U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 4:08 pm
John Taylor v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 7:03 am
United States, 730 F.2d 1465, 1468 (Fed. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 9:42 am
United States, 529 U.S. 848, 857 (2000) (quoting United States ex rel. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 1:44 pm
A qualified investment entity may presume that holders of less than five percent of a class of stock regularly traded on an established securities market in the United States are U.S. persons, except to the extent that the qualified investment entity has actual knowledge that such persons are not U.S. persons. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 12:30 pm
Both the majority and the dissent in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
John Reed Stark David Fontaine In this day and age, the members of the boards of directors of most companies understand that cybersecurity issues are both important and should be a board-level priority. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 3:29 pm
Potential inducers of patent infringement here could be the sellers of the 3D printers, someone providing CAD files of the patented device, or websites that sell or share various CAD files that instruct the 3D printer to make the patented invention.IPBiz notes In a 6-2 decision in June 2015, the United States Supreme Court in Commil USA, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 2:11 pm
Holder, 560 U.S. 563 (2010), and United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 2:11 pm
Holder, 560 U.S. 563 (2010), and United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 9:27 am
[v]Ibid. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:34 pm
The third viewpoint is that the privilege ceases upon the death of the original holder. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 1:01 am
” Justice Edward White Justice White gave as his rationale a citation from a previous case [United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 11:39 am
Roberts Court justices and their allies take the post-bellum Democratic position on the master principle underlying the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 8:05 am
§§ 1.6(a)(2), 2.195(a)(4), and 2.198 provide that certain correspondence deposited in the Priority Mail Express® service of the United States Postal Service (USPS) in accordance with 37 C.F.R. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 1:51 pm
Several weeks ago, in a per curiam decision with only Judge Newman dissenting, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied the Sequenom petition for rehearing en banc. [read post]
