Search for: "Williams v. Federal District Court"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 3,646
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2017, 11:05 am
Moreover, the Court is not persuaded by the ‘implication’ of the Superior Court’s decision in Fleming and, consequently, departs from the conclusion reached by the district court in Williams. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 2:27 pm
The complaint, Danielle Bologna v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:19 am
Hart and William W. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 7:22 am
Two separate district judges denied their requests, each concluding that the Military Commissions Act (MCA) stripped federal courts of jurisdiction to consider such challenges brought by Guantanamo detainees. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 7:14 am
Trump v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 6:12 pm
Feb. 21, 2019) the District Court was faced with a common situation in ADA lawsuits. [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:21 pm
Three years ago, when the Supreme Court questioned the constitutionality of the 1965 law (in Northwest Austin Utility District v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 10:15 pm
District court sided with the IRS – finding that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the case. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
But, it can also provide a focus for public education about the dangers of the Supreme Court’s Trump v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 9:34 am
The Supreme Court’s nine-year-old ruling in District of Columbia v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 5:20 am
While the Federal District Court ruled that Chinese drywall caused the requisite “physical loss” necessary for coverage and determined the loss was accidental, the Court ruled the damages were excluded and that no exceptions could be applied to provide coverage for the damages. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 10:52 am
Buchanan’s bankrupt project for placing State corporations at the mercy of the Federal Courts. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 7:02 pm
Co. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
We affirm the district court’s denial of relief on each of the issues properly raised on appeal. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 4:07 am
Walters and Meek v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:24 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York] [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 6:51 am
The district court agreed that at least one part of the patent was invalid because it was obvious. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 7:33 pm
In United States ex rel Stone v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 5:54 pm
Burnett v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
Noting that an employer ignored an employee’s treating ophthalmologist’s opinion that she could return to work, and instead relied on a state doctor’s opinion that she could not perform her duties, a federal district court in Maryland found a triable issue of fact on whether the employer regarded her as disabled. [read post]
