Search for: "-LRA Wells v. King"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 3,280
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2015, 6:45 pm
Beetson v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 3:31 pm
The much-awaited Supreme Court oral argument in King v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 11:14 am
Timothy Jost Yesterday's Supreme Court argument in King v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 11:10 am
In in South [Dakota] v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
Dec. 17, 2014).The issue has arisen in New York as well. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:28 pm
Of note, AG Pruitt filed the first lawsuit in federal court challenging the legality of the IRS rule at issue in King v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:28 pm
Now that I’m back on Ohio, here are some additional thoughts and observations about today’s oral argument in King v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 6:46 pm
Davis v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:34 pm
Americans trying to predict how the Supreme Court will rule on King v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:05 pm
Therefore it was crucial in the oral argument in King v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 2:48 pm
When King v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 12:29 pm
" Carvin hears the cue that it's amateur comedy time and cracks: "Well, if you're going to ruin my ten minutes. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 10:43 am
On Friday morning, when the Justices start their private conversation on the case of King v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 9:27 am
Buslon, et al v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:42 am
” The government, as well as Justices Breyer and Kagan, argue that if the only way for a state to “establish” an exchange is to create it on its own, then there would be no “qualified individuals” in states that failed to do so, and therefore there would be nobody on the [HHS] exchanges (and, as Justice Kagan surmised, no product to sell on the exchanges). [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:13 am
Of course, the government urges such a reading in this case, arguing that a holistic reading supports its view of the subsidy provisions, but the petitioners make whole-statute arguments as well even as they emphasize the particular words in Section 36B that support their argument most clearly. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:17 pm
[Legal Juice] * King v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:26 am
Congress and state governments almost certainly will be forced to deal with these broader challenges regardless of the outcome of King v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:22 am
While most Americans are familiar with the well-publicized issues and higher than projected premium costs of coverage offered to Americans enrolling in health care coverage through the federal healthcare marketplace Healthcare.gov created under the health care reforms of the Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act (ACA), many Americans are just beginning to recognize the growing problems […] [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 6:27 am
But on the eve of King v. [read post]
