Search for: "Andrews v. State" Results 1681 - 1700 of 4,959
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2019, 4:31 pm by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
The case is not final, pending the possibility of a motion for rehearing and the outcome of such a rehearing if it is granted, but interested persons should monitor its status.Assuming the Court’s opinion becomes final, it is difficult to know how counties with such mandatory requirements will react, both within and without the counties making up the Fourth DCA (such as whether they will remove such mandatory requirement, otherwise attempt to re-work their rules in light of the opinion, or… [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 9:30 pm by ernst
Here is one on Amistad; ongoing is one on Ableman v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Mary Ziegler, Florida State University College of Law and former LHB Guest Blogger is up on the BBC History Extra with A brief history of US abortion law, before and after Roe v Wade. [read post]
14 May 2015, 1:59 am by Justin Bates, Arden Chambers
In Hounslow LBC v Powell; Leeds CC v Hall; Birmingham CC v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8; [2011] 2 AC 18; [2011] HLR 23, the decision in Pinnock was held to be of general application whenever a public authority seek possession of a property that constitutes a person’s home. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
For example, Chief Justice Warren’s deferential approach to Congress in United States v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 10:02 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
” Pleasant Glade Assembly of God, 264 S.W.3d at 6; Andrews v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 1:45 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Later on Wednesday 22nd June, the Court will hear the case of R v Andrewes, on appeal from [2020] EWCA 1055. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
  Andrew is a lifetime member of the Million Dollar Advocates Forum, and  the author of "Are You a Canadian Injured in the United States? [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
At Reuters, Andrew Chung reports that “Monday’s ruling added clarity to a powerful defense employed by drug makers that product liability claims brought under state law are preempted by the actions of a federal agency, because federal law generally trumps state law under the U.S. [read post]