Search for: "Apple, Inc  " Results 1681 - 1700 of 5,453
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2017, 5:15 pm
  The most notable instance of such evasion occurred in Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 3:15 am by Steve Brachmann
On Monday, April 3rd, multiple news outlets were reporting that American consumer gadget developer Apple Inc. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 11:58 pm
 Two recent decisions show the various ways in which it is possible to win on appeal and the likelihood of such an appeal being successful.IWATCH - Apple Inc v Arcadia Trading LimitedArcadia opposed Apple's application for IWATCH on the basis that it was (1) made in bad faith because it was filed in the name of Brightflash USA LLC and later assigned to Apple, and (2) descriptive or devoid of distinctive character in relation to Class 9 (computers,… [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
Michael Maschke, CEO of Sensei Enterprises, Inc. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 11:47 am by Ron Coleman
Republished by Blog Post PromoterCNN.com reports: A lawyer for Apple Computer Inc. on Thursday dismissed as ridiculous a long-running trademark infringement claim by The Beatles’ Apple Corps record label that has landed the two cultural icons in Britain’s High Court. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:23 am by Audrey A Millemann
Apple Inc., decided by the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals on March 1, 2017. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 7:26 pm by Bill Marler
As for unpasteurized packaged juices, one of Marler’s earliest cases was the 1996 E. coli outbreak from unpasteurized Odwalla apple juice. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
Statute of limitations: Deadline: Motion for a new trial: Reexamination: Posttrial motion: Jurisdictional: Civil procedure: Affidavits: (…) We conclude that Code of Civil Procedure section 659a does not deprive a court of fundamental jurisdiction to consider affidavits submitted after the 30-day deadline set forth in the statute. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 7:33 am by Ronald Mann
Apple) and December (Life Technologies Corp. v Promega Corp.) sessions, the justices heard cases that involved rules for multi-component products. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 3:10 am
 IPOS (Intellectual Property Office of Singapore) Express: * Case Summary – Bigfoot Internet Ventures Pte Ltd v Apple Inc.Bigfoot Internet Ventures had put up an application for revocation of a trade mark “SHERLOCK” (referred to as the “Mark”) registered in the name of Apple Inc., claiming it was not put to use in Singapore for five years.Sherlock was a software application integrated into version 8.5 of the Macintosh computer… [read post]