Search for: "Branch v. State"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 6,955
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2009, 6:37 pm
United States (the conviction of former Enron CEO Jeffrey Skilling) Given the momentous financial events of the past year or two, perhaps its not surprising that the judiciary is taking an opportunity to join the executive and legislative branches in delving into these issues. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 8:15 am
Supreme Court profoundly impacts the balance of power among the branches of our government. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 9:24 pm
Supreme Court profoundly impacts the balance of power among the branches of our government. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 2:33 pm
United States mirrors the claims from Trump impeachment 1.0] In Trump v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 6:39 am
State of California, 95 F.3d 1461 (9th Cir. 1996). [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
In its 1989 decision in Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 9:50 am
Most views cluster around the conclusion I tend to share: the question whether the President can be compelled to testify was formally left open by United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 9:38 am
The case is known as the Steel Seizure Cases or Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:19 am
United States (1926), but they never acknowledge that the Brandeis dissent was rooted in a commitment to participatory democracy that Reynolds did not share. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 7:53 am
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court’s decision in Baker v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:18 am
Coverage continues of the amicus briefs filed earlier this week in Fisher v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 9:18 am
In a 1999 roundtable discussion, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, President Trump's nominee for the Supreme Court, suggested that United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 2:18 pm
Vance and Trump v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:59 am
In West Virginia v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 5:22 pm
The case is Sims v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 3:52 am
Under these circumstances, Ikhilov has stated a cause of action against the Lyubarskys to recover damages for contribution (see Schauer v Joyce, 54 NY2d at 5). [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 1:35 am
You may have noticed that one of the key issues in yesterday's global warming decision, Massachusetts v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Matter of Cook v Nassau County Police Dept., 140 AD3d 1059, the Appellate Division noted that the State Legislature, "[in] order to create a clear deterrent to unreasonable delays and denials of access [and thereby] encourage every unit of government to make a good faith effort to comply with the requirements of FOIL", provided for the assessment of an attorney's fee and other litigation costs in FOIL proceedings. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 6:20 am
"It can't be left to the executive branch's discretion to release these critically important opinions. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 5:19 am
Justice Kennedy in Vieth v. [read post]
