Search for: "Citizens for Constitutional Integrity" Results 1681 - 1700 of 2,601
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2014, 5:35 am by Joe May
Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision has dramatically altered the climate. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 4:10 am by SHG
  There isn’t much traction for monied interests promoting judges because of their lack of partisanship, fairness and respect for constitutional rights. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
We considered the theories under which government is organized and their application to the United States, the development of a hierarchy of law, its relation to the law developed in international for a, and then considered the issue of legal integrity through the notion of “rule of law” as a political and juridical concept. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 8:01 am by Allison Tussey
  The Court also ordered Peele to pay $728,244 in restitution to the victims of his offense, as well as the forfeiture of certain real estate constituting fraudulent proceeds of the offense. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 10:42 am
The fact that I was an elected official, does not mean someone can stab me, kill me or harass me; they have no constitutional rights to do so and those actions are not protected under our constitutional rights to free speech, which makes this decision by Judge McGuirl all the more egregious,” he said. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 3:31 pm by Dave Maass
Lynch and Bibring argued: In each of these examples, disclosure of the data was integral to informed debate—within the legislatures, among the general public, and even within the agencies themselves. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 4:15 pm by Jacek Stramski
Both Citizens and the State of Florida as amicus argue that Citizens has absolute sovereign immunity because, “Citizens Property Insurance Corporation, [is] a government entity that is an integral part of the state, and that [Citizens] is not a private insurance company. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:32 am by Jamie Maclaren
This is part and parcel to the established “living tree doctrine” of constitutional interpretation and the principle of constitutional supremacy. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:43 am
Here is the full opinion: The following constitutes the court’s decision and order concerning the closure of the Nassau County Surrogate’s Court from public access during the A and C adoption related proceeding. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 9:00 pm by Cody Poplin
Strong motivation and aptitude for work within a highly integrated team. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 7:23 pm by Steve Vladeck
” Although he doesn’t elaborate, what I assume Peter is getting at is that the Missouri citizen could have been tried by a military commission, whereas al Bahlul, in my view, cannot be (at least for non-international war crimes). [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 9:00 pm by Cody Poplin
Provide timely reviews of planned ODNI and IC activities for compliance with the Constitution and laws of the US, Executive Orders, and other applicable regulations and policies affecting ODNI and the IC and brief ODNI leaders on potential legal and policy issues, and develop solutions to address difficult legal problems having potential high-level or large-scale impact on the ODNI’s or the IC missions and activities. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 4:54 pm
Here, if government action or statute impacts citizens as a function of the way that government is expected to act, then only the manner in which the government is exercising its lawful duty will be analyzed. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 5:51 am by Jim Sedor
Citizens United argued it fell under protections for media and its “Rocky Mountain Heist” film did not constitute electioneering communications. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 8:45 am
Is it true, as an amicus brief in an earlier case argued, that “from Oregon’s constitutional perspective, a citizen of Florida, Texas, or Vermont has no more of an interest or stake in . . . making campaign contributions in Oregon than does a citizen of Montreal or Mexico City”? [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 9:00 pm by Cody Poplin
Strong motivation and aptitude for work within a highly integrated team. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 9:59 am by Cody Poplin
—Consistent with section 8(a)(1) of the War Powers Resolution, the Congress declares that this section is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution. (2) Applicability of other requirements. [read post]