Search for: "Doe v. Holder"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 6,694
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
A condemnee is defined under the EDPL as "the holder of any right, title, interest, lien, charge or encumbrance in real property subject to an acquisition or proposed acquisition" (EDPL 103 [C]). [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
A condemnee is defined under the EDPL as "the holder of any right, title, interest, lien, charge or encumbrance in real property subject to an acquisition or proposed acquisition" (EDPL 103 [C]). [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 4:50 pm
Holder, 569 U.S. 184, 190–91 . . . (2013). [read post]
25 May 2017, 1:30 pm
Indeed, it was in Romer v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 8:42 am
"(emphasis added)In a nutshell, the above passage says:If what Google does basically just has a promotional effect, right holders can't complain that Google helps them make more money.But forget about "fair use" if there is a substitutive (rather than promotional) effect.If one applies that standard to Oracle v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 7:09 am
Barger v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 11:09 am
Holder, 132S. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 4:21 pm
Upstream is at issue in EFF’s Jewel v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 9:46 am
Although Alice Corp. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 11:09 am
Facebook v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 12:49 pm
The Report does not specify at which level such mediation should take place. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 7:09 am
Nonsense; no other patentee does the things Qualcomm does. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 3:30 am
The new CDIs address the following areas: Question 128D.14 – Awards granted in fiscal years prior to an equity restructuring (such as a spin-off) that are retained by the holder must be included in the calculation of executive compensation actually paid. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
The influential Second Circuit has interpreted many DMCA safe harbor provisions that affect both online service providers and copyright holders. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
Of course, the Supreme Court’s ruling does nothing to change the practical realities for junior lien holders where the collateral is worth less than the value of the first lien. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 12:32 pm
Perry v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 8:19 am
Holder is not warranted. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 9:23 am
Acadia Motors, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
It was based on the following two starting premises (para 22 cited in [201]): i) The smallest saleable patent practising unit (SSPPU) for cellular SEPs is the baseband chipset, where the functioning of the cellular standards is substantially practiced or embodied; and ii) The proportion of the overall cellular declared SEP royalty profits that is allocated to the cellular SEP holders is determined to be no more than the profits of the baseband chipset. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 3:41 pm
Over the past 24 hours there have been well over 100 blog posts about the recent ruling in the Lenz v. [read post]
