Search for: "Does 1 through 5" Results 1681 - 1700 of 24,638
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2018, 2:00 pm by Robert Liles
Justice Manual, § 1-19.000 – Limitation on Issuance of Guidance Documents: As § 1-19.000 of the Justice Manual provides, when issuing non-binding guidance documents, DOJ components should expressly identify the documents as guidance that does not carry the force or effect of law. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 5:57 am by Bob Kraft
The post 5 Things Adults With Disabilities Can Get for Free appeared first on pissd.com. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 6:48 am
That the results of the USPO's duties may have dual uses (i.e. forming the basis for a revocation of supervised release and the initiation of new criminal charges) does not run afoul of the separation of powers. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 8:20 am
The Summons: C.R.S. 16-5-206 through 16-5-207 This is a notice requiring a person to appear in court on a specific day at a specific time. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 5:57 am
The questions referred by the French Court of Cassation read as follows: “1. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 1:26 pm by Geoff Schweller
On June 21, the SEC issued over $5 million in whistleblower awards. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 1:51 pm
That's notable, but still represents fewer than 1 in 5 employers. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 9:46 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
We nowaffirm the rejection of claims 1–4 and reverse the upholdingof claims 5 and 6. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 3:00 am by Timothy Lorang
Too often a company will set up a pay-per-click ad campaign, make the mistakes listed in points 1 through 8 and conclude that paid search is a complete waste of time. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 6:08 pm
That comparison is meant to touch on the core ideological differences propelling each project as well as its expression in the structure and forms memorialized through its provisions. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 10:03 am by Bob Farb
Allman (5 Jan. 2016), ruled (2-1) that a search warrant to search a residence for drugs was not supported by probable cause because the affidavit failed to link the residence to drug activity that had occurred elsewhere. [read post]