Search for: "Does 1-39" Results 1681 - 1700 of 5,128
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2018, 4:40 am by Public Employment Law Press
The unlawful appointments to a district’s shared decision-making team, [Appeal of Sadue-Sokolow, 39 Ed Dept Rep 6, Decision No. 14,155]; c. [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:02 pm by MOTP
In issues two through four, Doggett argues that The Travis Law Firm cannot recover attorney’s fees from a prior lawsuit as actual damages because (1) the Texas Supreme Court has not adopted an equitable exception to the general rule regarding attorney’s fees; (2) an attorney representing himself does not incur attorney’s fees; and (3) The Travis Law Firm was not a prevailing party in the prior lawsuit. [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
The state does not restrict privilege recognition to its legislature, but, like federal law, allows for privilege development through common law or by state statute. [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
The state does not restrict privilege recognition to its legislature, but, like federal law, allows for privilege development through common law or by state statute. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:17 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Acthar Gel is a biologically derived corticotropin drug – not a steroid – and amongst its many components includes a 1-39 peptide chain, meaning it includes more than simply ACTH. [read post]
2 May 2018, 12:40 pm by emagraken
  In finding that a “marginal difference” does not warrant such an outcome Madam Justice Forth provided the following reasons: [39]         The plaintiff submits that the Defendant’s Offer was greater than the judgment amount by only $639.16, or approximately 0.5%. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 12:15 pm by Giles Peaker
Initial 1 year fixed term with potential for extension. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 6:09 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Wiecek, The History of the Supreme Court of the United States, p. 449, foot note 39). [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 8:30 am by Liisa Speaker
 In both cases, the Court of Appeals indicated that it does not matter how far along in the adoption process the putative father gets the order of filiation, nor does it matter whether he provided no support to the child or the mother.In re MGRIn re MGR (Docket Nos. 338286 and 340203, issued 2/27/18) is a published and binding decision. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:41 am by Bartosz Krakowiak
One of very few non-Polish aspects of this case is the trademark itself – the word mark ‘HOUSE OF CARS’, applied for inter alia various vehicle and transport related services in classes 35, 37 and 39. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:05 am
As explained in paragraphs 39-43 above, and as the facts of the present case illustrate, the scope of protection test proves too much in this context. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 3:29 pm by Kent Scheidegger
If the statute does not so plainly state, then animals do not have statutory standing. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Supreme Court, (Pace Law Review, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2017).Matthew O. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund that securities plaintiffs could bring class actions under the Securities Act of 1933 (“1933 Act”) in state courts.[1] The Court’s unanimous decision contrasts sharply with the rancor the ruling will cause: Cyan portends a paradigm shift in how defense lawyers defend securities class actions and D&O insurers cover and monitor them. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
If California voters were to adopt the measure, it would then move on to be considered by the federal government; the US Constitution requires federal as well as state approval before new states are added to the union.Given that the measure may be before California voters in a matter of months, I offer below a brief summary of the proposal, and then three key clusters of considerations the voters of California—the large majority of whom lean towards the Democratic party—should want to… [read post]