Search for: "Files v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 3,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 7:14 pm
Moyle, D.C.L. of Lincoln’s Inn, Barrister-at-Law,Fellow and Late Tutor of New College, OxfordFifth Edition (1913)http://www.gutenberg.org/files/5983/5983-h/5983-h.htm * PROOEMIVM *In the name of Our Lord, Jesus Christ. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 8:25 pm
Title: Siefert v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 6:41 pm
Audubon Soc’y v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 9:00 am
Petitioners, a contingent of environmental and community groups, bring serious challenges to the State of California's plans to improve air quality in the San Joaquin Valley, an area with some of the worst air quality in the United States -- i.e. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 7:58 pm
With the exception of certain kinds of standard-essential patents (for example, cellular standards patents), it's clear that the product will still be sold after being modified to work around the enforced patents, maybe after a minor disruption caused by the need to make those modifications.If products are named in an injunction order, they are only examples of infringement and do not limit the scope of an injunction that is worded like Judge Koh's two recent injunctions against… [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
Although BMW of North America, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 8:00 pm
The Leahy-Smith AIA refers directly to harmonization only once and only in an aspirational “sense of Congress” provision that reads as follows: Sense of Congress - It is the sense of the Congress that converting the United States patent system from ‘first to invent’ to a system of ‘first inventor to file’ will improve the United States patent system and promote harmonization of the United… [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:46 am
And after reading about the recent decision by the Second Circuit in Cammeby’s v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:46 am
And after reading about the recent decision by the Second Circuit in Cammeby’s v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:20 am
” [ii]That rationale has deep roots in America. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
(in support of petitioner) Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 4:39 am
It doesn’t matter that, when Pollard is hurt at a prison the United States of America sent him to, he can’t sue the United States or its officers, and can’t use the United States’ laws for redress. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 11:43 am
” Return Mail, Inc. v United States Postal Service, 2019 U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 8:35 pm
Pending before the US Supreme Court is a petition for a writ of certiorari to review a decision where: the employer, insurance company and their experts were found to have conducted themselves in violation of the RICO Act.Motions for leave to file Amicus briefs in support of the defense position have been filed by: MI Self-Insurers Association; Michigan Defense Trial Counsel; DRI - The Voice of the Defense Bar; … [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 9:51 am
In addition to representing clients in such claims, BakerHostetler prepared and filed the amicus curiae brief filed in support of Winn-Dixie on behalf of 13 associations, including the Restaurant Law Center, the American Hotel & Lodging Association, the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, and the National Retail Federation. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 5:11 am
United States, 393 F.3d 1277 (Fed. [read post]
12 May 2015, 2:47 pm
The Appellate Court’s Decision The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the district court’s dismissal of the suit. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:57 am
Also, while we are on the subject of international aspects of the death penalty, it would address the problem of foreign interference in the execution of our law through restriction of the drugs used for lethal injection.Leal has applied to the US Supreme Court for relief supported by the Governments of the United States of America and the United Mexican States. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 8:30 am
Last week, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
