Search for: "GEORGE v. STATE"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 7,213
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2014, 9:28 pm
Maages Auditorium v Prince George’s County, 4 F. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 9:13 pm
Anja Seibert-Fohr (Member, UN Human Rights Committee; Georg-August-Universität Göttingen - Law) & Mark E. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 7:01 pm
I am reminded of the Court's pending affirmative action case, Fisher v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 5:56 am
[How Appealing] * And SCOTUS also grants cert to a case raising the scope of what prosecutors must disclose to the defense under Brady v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 7:38 am
While their scope is open-ended, we would note that the Supreme Court held in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 9:19 am
In the case of McArthur v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 9:38 am
Dinah Shelton (George Washington Univ. - Law) has published The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law (Oxford Univ. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 10:32 am
We are happy to report that the court in the case, Arizona Broadcasters Association v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
Prior to graduation from Saint George's University School of Medicine, W.K. applied for, and was granted, a pediatric residency with New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 3:46 pm
The federal district court in Manhattan yesterday heard arguments in the matter of United States Of America v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 4:12 pm
” United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 11:30 am
” Galik v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
That’s Constitutional Law I/Marbury v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Hildebrandt (1916), Smiley v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 9:24 am
State Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 1:56 pm
” State v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 2:25 pm
Cummings v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:01 pm
That was the knock, of course, on the infamous (and thoroughly discredited) Bush v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 11:15 am
MICHAEL PALOMBI V. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 10:43 am
While an earlier version of the case was pending before the Supreme Court in 2005, President Bush issued a memorandum stating he would meet the treaty obligations by “having state courts give effect” to the World Court ruling.But the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals rejected the command, ruling that the state’s limits on successive habeas applications took precedence.As the case Medellin v Texas made its way back to the high court last… [read post]
