Search for: "James v. United States (two Cases)" Results 1681 - 1700 of 2,863
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2014, 11:12 am by Cody Poplin
” The United States has finalized a 25-year agreement with Australia that will double the number of American troops training with Australian security forces, according to Defense One. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am by Ronald Collins
 The tension between representation and discursive democracy is at the heart of the doctrinal confusion of cases like Citizens United. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 11:14 pm
“[I]n such case it is the law of [the state where the mortal blow is given] that is violated, and not the law of the state where death may happen to occur” (Stout v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 7:10 pm by Lauren Bateman
 Vance Spath, begins the morning’s hearing in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 9:39 am by Marty Lederman
United States, 408 U.S. 606, 624 (1972) (“committee reports are protected”); id. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 7:10 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Since 2003, a third of the net new jobs created in the United States were in Texas. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 2:54 am by Ben
Sunde, who avoid incarceration for a number of years had previously been on the run for two years, complained he should have been held in a low security unit for his eight month prison term. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 5:52 am by admin
Prior caselaw has excluded single-family houses and two-family homes with a rented unit from the definition. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 10:48 am by Bill Marler
Persons with Shigellosis in the United States rarely require hospitalization. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
Over 20 years ago, in 1993, the United States Supreme Court handed down its Daubert decision. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am by Bill Marler
The litigation stems from one of the deadliest foodborne illness outbreaks in United States history. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm by Bill Marler
Additionally, the receipt of this warning letter and any action taken to correct the violations cited in it do not preclude a subsequent criminal prosecution by the United States Department of Justice[15]. [read post]