Search for: "MATTER OF H D"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 3,840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
It held that the Elder Abuse Act does not require the existence of a custodial relationship in order for the plaintiff to establish a cause of action for neglect.[2] The court also rejected defendants’ contention that the trial court should determine, as a matter of law, whether defendants’ conduct constituted professional negligence rather than neglect. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:23 am
Bruce H. [read post]
18 May 2016, 2:16 pm
Hardiman of Pennsylvania; William H. [read post]
16 May 2016, 3:22 pm
McElroy observed that `[h]e had some type of microphone. [read post]
13 May 2016, 7:55 am
The combined expansions of criminal coverage and the heightened severity of punishments are matters of grave concern that call for a serious rethinking of this project. [read post]
12 May 2016, 10:59 am
The order also required Fanning to give a copy of the order to the principals, officers, and agents of any “current and future employers” having responsibilities with respect to the subject matter of the order. [read post]
12 May 2016, 4:34 am
Google, I have repeatedly taken issue with Judge Lucy Koh's unwilligness to invalidate bad patents, but all in all I'm still glad she has been nominated for the Ninth Circuit rather than Judge William H. [read post]
12 May 2016, 4:16 am
“I felt as if there had just been a coup d’etat in America,” Ratner thought at the time. [read post]
10 May 2016, 7:51 pm
(Hint: it starts with "H" and rhymes with "Yeller", and has to do with the Second Amendment.) [read post]
10 May 2016, 8:09 am
They state over and over that the professor “recklessly” caused harm by his blog post, that he “recklessly exposed” a campus colleague to harm, that he “violated his obligations” as a faculty member by “recklessly, albeit indirectly, causing harm” to his colleague, and that the post “was reckless” “in posing a significant, albeit indirect, risk of harm,” and “[h]is actions, if not intentional, were certainly… [read post]
6 May 2016, 11:44 am
The definition will also include any information a BIAS provider attaches to a customer’s Internet traffic if it falls within one of the categories in Section 222(h)(1)(A). [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:41 pm
We’d scale and always treat it as a floor and not a ceiling. [read post]
1 May 2016, 9:01 pm
That section, in combination with DRL §236(B)(5)(h), and DRL §236(B)(6)(d) empowers a court to direct specific performance of a Ketubah (the marriage contract) or other agreement by which a husband previously agreed to provide a get to his wife. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:45 am
As such, could this mean that in France Google would have to seek a licence to reproduce images of architectural works and sculptures, no matter where permanently located [this might not be the only image-related headache for Google in France: see here]? [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 7:18 am
This post examines an opinion from the U.S. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 3:01 am
Richard H. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 4:03 pm
While the figures on disadvantage might not be conclusive, that didn’t matter, as the policy was clearly not designed with the ‘least intrusive measure’ in mind. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:03 pm
According to David Salsburg, H. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 2:55 pm
Class D habitual felons received mitigated sentences 72 percent of the time. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 2:55 pm
Class D habitual felons received mitigated sentences 72 percent of the time. [read post]
