Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE" Results 1681 - 1700 of 42,191
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2010, 8:53 am
  The amendment commentary states:A witness who is not required to provide a report under Rule 26(a)(2)(B) may both testify as a fact witness and also provide expert testimony under Evidence Rule 702, 703, or 705. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 3:27 am by Aparajita Lath
It was held that since the Acts define 'prescribed' as 'rules made by the Appellate Body' and these Rules confer the power of review, this power falls under 'any other matter prescribed'. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 4:06 pm by William Gaskill
It finally held that the additional testimony satisfied the chain of custody requirement as the actual location of recovery in this case did not matter. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 10:53 am
Currently, Rule 26 allows discovery of information that is relevant to any claim or defense, including information that “appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 6:50 am by John Jascob
"The letter first notes that the proxy advisor rule is grounded in years of evidence and data regarding flaws in the proxy advisory system that harm investors and competition, and that the SEC should prioritize effective oversight and enforcement of the rule. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 12:36 pm
We've discussed the learned intermediary rule on this blog many times before - such as here, here, and here. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 6:18 am by Joy Waltemath
An instant messaging conversation between two HR managers, in which they discussed an employee’s “shelf life” in deciding whether to eliminate his position, was merely an inartful reference to the amount of his remaining billable work, not direct evidence of age discrimination, the Tenth Circuit ruled (Roberts v International Business Machines Corp, November 5, 2013, Gorsuch, N). [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:29 am by Susan Brenner
  In ruling on this issue, the Court of Appeals explained that [r]elevant evidence is evidence tending to prove or disprove a material fact. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 8:04 am by Aparajita Lath
Rule 33(6) allows the Registrar to condone a delay with regard to submission of evidence. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 2:29 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  The Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule is the rule that an item of evidence -- regardless of how reliable it may be and much value it may have in guiding the trier of fact to the truth of the matter to be decided in the criminal case -- must be excluded if it is found that the police violated the complex rules governing search and seizures under that Amendment.The exclusionary rule has no basis in the text of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 10:16 am by Matthew Lewis
The Regional Director is required under the new rules to reach a decision on the matter. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 10:58 am by Schachtman
How does the new Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence (RMSE3d 2011) treat statistical significance? [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 10:40 pm
  Although Rule 37 was repealed and replaced with Rule 37B, the underlying rationale of Rule 37 is, in my opinion, still informative. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 1:57 pm by Greg Jordan
 Taking all this into account, the court held that the lower court erred when it ruled, as a matter of law, that the pipeline served the public and that HSC was a common carrier. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 8:51 am
But if you have a case with a lot of close calls on evidence, the judge you draw really does matter. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 9:50 am
  Here is the abstract:The Civil Rules Advisory Committee has recently proposed the most significant revisions to Rule 56 since the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were adopted seventy years ago. [read post]