Search for: "Mark I. Congress"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 7,022
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2024, 7:34 am
Recently, I had the pleasure of giving a virtual presentation along with my BKK colleague, Mark Viani, covering a number of significant recent workplace changes, including the FTC’s new Non-Compete Clause Rule, which will make it unlawful as of September 4, 2024, for employers to enter into new non-compete clauses with workers. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 11:37 am
I myself had thought there was something that wasn’t trademark use all that long ago, when, merely in passing, I not so accurately wrote the following: In one recent situation I encountered, a restaurant owner was all but certain that the owner of the registration whose mark was very much like his had been unduly “inspired” by his own restaurant. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:37 am
I myself had thought there was something that wasn’t trademark use all that long ago, when, merely in passing, I not so accurately wrote the following: In one recent situation I encountered, a restaurant owner was all but certain that the owner of the registration whose mark was very much like his had been unduly “inspired” by his own restaurant. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm
(That decision is “Starbucks I,” in case you’re keeping track.) [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 10:12 am
I am going to catch up on a number of items I have meant to blog on this week, all in one fell swoop. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
In doing so, I should acknowledge that I previously worked at OLC on these issues, and I was familiar with most of these memoranda prior to their release from my time there. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 5:30 am
Congress hath no fury like a McConnell scorned. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 5:55 am
Griffin, Jr. as General Counsel will ensure the NLRB’s ability to enforce the National Labor Relations Act,” said NLRB Board Chairman Mark Gaston Pearce. [read post]
31 May 2012, 11:25 am
John Conyers (D-Michigan) suggested at least Congress should not be kept in the dark about how the law is being used. “I come to this hearing disturbed by how little we know and how much more we need to know,” he said. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 1:57 pm
This commentary is by Mark W. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 5:06 pm
Whenever I conduct blog review calls with attorneys, a time when we give some editorial feedback on content, there are a few points I always stress. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 10:13 am
Within 1 year, the PTO Director will provide a report to Congress on the results. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 5:29 pm
"The only way I can think of to do it is to force the issue," Simpson said. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 4:55 pm
I, 5) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 3:52 am
A more direct engagement comes from Mark Joseph Stern at Slate, and here is Michael Stern at Point of Order as well (no relation that I know of). [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 2:58 pm
I Obviousness over the CGK - dead or alive? [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 6:30 am
I’ve read most of Mark’s books and for relevance and making a timely punch in the right direction, Taking Back the Constitution is one of the best. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 1:43 pm
I anticipate that a forthcoming work by Mark Graber will speak very directly to this problem. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 5:29 am
I am often asked what a name day is, what the origin of the practice is, and who decides whose name day it is. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 7:44 am
While it wasn’t the final collision or the ultimate rejection (by definition), yesterday’s House Judiciary Committee “mark up” hearing on the Stop Online Piracy Act had attributes of both. [read post]
