Search for: "May v. Austin" Results 1681 - 1700 of 2,237
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2009, 2:08 pm
If you're the sort of person who reads transcripts of Supreme Court oral arguments, and if you have even a passing interest in civil rights law, then you probably figured that Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act was history.The case was Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 12:36 am
For the liberal justices, I would call Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 10:36 am by MOTP
   Section 254.004(a) of the Texas Estates Code provides as follows: (a) A contract executed or entered into on or after September 1, 1979, to make a will or devise, or not to revoke a will or devise, may be established only by: (1) a written agreement that is binding and enforceable; or (2) a will stating: (A) that a contract exists; and (B) the material provisions of the contract. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 10:36 am by Marty Lederman
By Marty Lederman and David LubanThis coming Friday, the Supreme Court Justices are scheduled to consider, at conference, the government’s nominal “petition for certiorari” in No. 17-654, Hargan v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 12:47 pm by Jeremy
This has saved my business form destruction and I am investing in photography once again.Jonathan then provides further detail.The Case Number is IP14S01982 Jonathan C K Webb (Claimant:) v 1.VA Events Ltd, Carl Jason Austin and Dale Stanley Vicker, 5 March 2015. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am by INFORRM
Lynch had accused Austin of sexually abusing a foster child many years earlier — a charge that Justice Punnett ruled was unfounded, unjustified and false. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by Canadian Association of Law Libraries
Richard Albert from the University of Texas in Austin is Canadian and has published over 25 books on constitutional reform. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:28 am by Eugene Volokh
I don't have much to say about yesterday's Fifth Circuit decision in Defense Distributed v. [read post]