Search for: "NICHOLAS v. NICHOLAS" Results 1681 - 1700 of 2,003
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2019, 11:51 am by Erin Hustings
In another example of disagreement over the meaning of evidence of intentional discrimination, Judge Nicholas Garaufis of the U.S. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 6:41 am by Betty Lupinacci
Figure 6 Memorial erected in remembrance of Moiwana Massacre (Photo credit: Nicholas Laughlin on Flickr. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 2:41 am by 1 Crown Office Row
  In relation to sentencing in the Crown Court, there was some Court of Appeal authority on sentencing which arose from riots in Bradford, West Yorkshire back in 2001 – see R v Chapman 2002 and R v Najeeb 2003. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 3:03 pm
The Court has already rejected the same argument in Scheanette v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
Nicholas Bala, Patricia Hebert, and Rachel Birnbaum argued that professional organizations should “develop professional guidelines” with an emphasis on child-centric lawyering (588). [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 4:47 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
In Match Group v Muzmatch [2022] EWHC 1023 (IPEC), Nicholas Caddick KC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) expanded upon the limits of the permitted activities under the embargo in relation to the press. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
In a series of case from about 2003, the ECtHR began to treat a person’s reputation as being capable of protection by Article 8 as part of the right to respect for private life: see, for example, Cumpana v Romania (2004) 41 EHRR 200 at [91], Chauvy v France (2004) 41 EHRR 610 at [70] and White v Sweden [2007] EMLR 1 at [21]. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
Businessman Nicholas Biwott has received the highest defamation award in Kenyan history. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 6:34 pm by Robichaud
The presumption of diminished responsibility of youth in murder sentencing under Canadian law and the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA): the case of R. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 11:58 am
Norris v USA: judgment in full "He described the obstruction charge as "subsidiary" to the price-fixing charge that the law lords ruled was not an extraditable offence. [read post]