Search for: "People v. Profit" Results 1681 - 1700 of 4,429
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2017, 3:12 pm by Melissa Perry (CA)
  On February 6, 2015, the Supreme Court of Canada in Carter v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 1:12 pm by Chris Castle
Copyright Office is good news for Google, which aims to pay less for profiting from the property of others…. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
” To be more precise, “[t]he blog on which the post appeared was a small one run by a non-profit association. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 3:21 am by Dennis Crouch
District Judge James Robart in Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2017)I have just posted a preliminary draft of an article that is currently entitled The Corporate Social Responsibilities of Financial Institutions for the Conduct of their Borrowers: The View from International Law and Standards. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 12:21 pm
Adkinson, supra.The judge went on to explain that[t]he mission statement of T-Mobile's Loss Prevention program is to `protect people, property and company profitability by utilizing the Loss Prevention teams' knowledge, expertise, and partnerships. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Is it the sum of contractual relations among some of the people with stakes in the joint enterprise? [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 6:13 am by Andres
This follows two controversial previous decisions in Delfi v Estonia and MTE v Hungary. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 3:16 pm by Giles Peaker
In fact, the documents produced by the Defendant more or less acknowledge the capacity in the scheme to discriminate: their “Pre-implementation Equality Analysis” says that “disabled people are more than twice as likely to be unemployed as non-disabled people” and that there is “potential for people with disabilities to be disadvantaged within the process, particularly those with mental illness”. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 4:24 am by Linda Hazelton
v=j8p24P6MddEhttps://www.youtube.com/watch? [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:26 am by INFORRM
There are several other reasons why the decision of the House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers was aberrant. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Media reports we found notably balanced, accurate or otherwise helpful to transparency this week Rachel Johnson’s report of Owens v Owens for the Daily Mail, as acknowledged here by Jo Edwards of Resolution: Spot on re #nofaultdivorce & urgent need for reform @RachelSJohnson (even if some reader comments are out of touch) https://t.co/WIgMtSHOAg — Jo Edwards (@MissJoEdwards) March 26, 2017 A cluster of constructive local press reports about social work achievements,… [read post]