Search for: "S G v. J G" Results 1681 - 1700 of 3,821
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2015, 4:29 pm
Section 2 of the Representation Agreement Regulationdefines routing management of the adult’s financial affairs as follows:2  (1) For the purposes of section 7 (1) (b) of the Act, the following activities constitute "routine management of the adult's financial affairs":(a) paying the adult's bills;(b) receiving the adult's pension, income and other money;(c) depositing the adult's pension, income and other… [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 9:34 pm by Dennis Crouch
See Stanford v Roche (2011) (Breyer, J., dissenting) (citing G. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 6:56 am by Latham & Watkins LLP
The guidance follows the decision of the European Court of Justice (the ECJ) in Case C-362/14 – Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner that Decision 2000/520 of the European Commission, which stated that Safe Harbor-certified US companies provide adequate protection for personal data transferred to them from the EU (the Safe Harbor Adequacy Decision), is invalid. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 12:32 pm
  * The Darjeeling question: what's your cup of tea -- a T-bag or a G-string? [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 6:13 am
Deckelbaum, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, on Monday, October 19, 2015 Editor's Note: Ariel J. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Same was true of Goodyear about personal jurisdiction—J. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 6:06 am by José Manuel Gómez Porchini
Entiendo perfectamente que mucha gente no puede subir, que son para jóvenes y deportistas, pero lamentablemente los muertos en accidentes a escasos metros de los pasos peatonales, son más de jóvenes que de adultos mayores. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 4:01 am by Administrator
Les événements allégués seraient survenus entre le 1er janvier 2000 et le 23 août 2008, soit tant sous le mandat de Poirier que sous celui de Berniquez St-Jean à titre de maires. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
  The conflicts are most acute when one country’s legal prohibitions on producing data in response to surveillance directives cannot be squared with another country’s legal compulsions to do so. [read post]