Search for: "Samples v. Samples"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 5,707
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2010, 9:13 am
ACLU says California DNA law violates privacy [San Francisco Chronicle] Haskell v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 4:09 pm
Kendrick, 85 USPQ2d 1032 (TTAB 2007) (use alleged for retail store services when mark had only been used on small number of product samples, which were given away four years before application); Hurley International LLC v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 5:00 am
Upon my return, among two weeks' worth of emails, was news that the Ninth Circuit had withdrawn its opinion in the Wang case (previously published at 709 F.3d 829 (9th Cir. 2013)), and issued a new opinion, Wang v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 6:10 am
V. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 11:10 am
Rudnicki v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 8:43 am
The New Jersey Supreme Court ruled in State v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 9:10 pm
AstraZeneca v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
Lavelle v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 6:18 pm
Co. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 8:00 am
In Skinner v. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 7:27 pm
Connearney v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 7:51 pm
Documents showing Defendant's informed consent to taking of samples.3. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:13 pm
One commentator analogized the report methodology to "evaluating the quality of restaurants by only requesting menus be mailed to the evaluator — without sampling the food or visiting the site. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
Where the proprietor of a trade mark supplies to its authorised distributors items bearing that mark, intended for demonstration to consumers in authorised retail outlets, and bottles bearing the mark from which small quantities can be taken for supply to consumers as free samples, those goods, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, are not put on the market within the meaning of Directive 89/104 and Regulation No 40/94 [= Case C-127/09 Coty Prestige Lancaster v Simex,… [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 8:39 am
Supreme Court’s 1966 decision in Miranda v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:58 am
In State v. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 5:36 pm
At the relevant times, Dr Alexander was Head of Virology at RCH where his primary role was to maintain the Virology/Tissue Culture and Molecular Diagnostics service, which conducts viral diagnostic work on upwards of 10,000 clinical samples at the hospital each year. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:03 pm
Schmerber v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 3:02 am
Gaos [Marcia Coyle on rewards-program class action settlement in Perryman v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 1:46 pm
In Settlemire v. [read post]
