Search for: "Samsung"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 6,688
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2017, 5:42 am
In my eyes Apple's credibility benefits from the broadbased support it has in this industry (and I can't see even the slightest indication that what Apple, Samsung, Intel and others are advocating here wouldn't also be good for consumers), but that doesn't mean I buy everything it says. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:39 am
"That last subclause is reminiscent of the most brilliant passage in all those Samsung filings in its dispute with Apple, where Samsung, in its answer to Apple's first complaint back in 2010, ironically conceded not having ceased to compete with Apple. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 4:44 pm
The appellees were SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNGELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNGSEMICONDUCTOR, INC., and SAMSUNG AUSTINSEMICONDUCTOR LLC. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 10:53 am
., 834 F. 3d 220 (2nd.Cir.2016) Norcia v Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC 845 F.3d 1279 (9th.Cir.2017) McMillan v Chaker 2017 WL 1336941 (S.D.Cal. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 3:38 am
We've Moved! [read post]
Qualcomm's NXP deal raises chip- and patent-related concerns: in-depth review by European Commission
12 Jun 2017, 7:22 am
After acquiring NXP, Qualcomm's position will go up to approximately 1,350 patents and applications, putting Qualcomm far ahead of the rest (almost twice as many as Samsung, for example). [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:10 pm
Samsung case (this post continues below the document): 17-06-05 Samsung Reply Brief Iso Cert Petition by Florian Mueller on ScribdObviously, Apple would like to avoid Supreme Court review and just get the most favorable outcome. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 10:46 am
Samsung jury was criticized. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 6:33 am
Two months after asking the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to dismiss the FTC's antitrust complaint, and three weeks after the FTC argued (with support from Intel, Samsung and others) that its complaint met the requirements so the case can proceed, Qualcomm replied on Friday in support of its motion to dismiss (this post continues below the document): 17-06-02 Qualcomm Reply Re. [read post]
3 Jun 2017, 4:23 am
We've Moved! [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 11:18 am
Driver Perishes in Elk Grove Car Fire I’m Ed Smith, a Sacramento Wrongful Death Lawyer. [read post]
30 May 2017, 9:31 pm
Instead of buying your smartphone, you’ll “license” it from Apple or Samsung, which will retain title to the device. [read post]
30 May 2017, 9:53 am
Samsung but it does play a role in Apple v. [read post]
27 May 2017, 8:29 am
So how convenient that Nick Statt just came out with an article for the Verge setting out the roadmap for doing exactly that, with How Anker is Beating Apple and Samsung at Their Own Accessory Game. [read post]
25 May 2017, 10:05 pm
David Pogue of Yahoo discusses the features in the new Samsung Galaxy 8 that are not on the iPhone 7, and indicates which ones are actually useful and might be nice to have on the iPhone. [read post]
25 May 2017, 1:44 pm
We've Moved! [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:38 am
Only two days after disagreeing with various aspects of Apple's opposition to Samsung's latest Supreme Court petition, one part of which is related to an injunction ruling in Apple's favor, I can't help but point out which parts of Qualcomm's preliminary-injunction motion are unconvincing at a closer look.As long as Qualcomm doesn't grant patent licenses on FRAND terms to chipset makers such as Intel (which filed a great amicus brief in support of the FTC) and… [read post]
23 May 2017, 3:04 pm
Former conservative party leader Park Guen-hye [BBC profile] was indicted [NYT report] on 18 charges including accepting $52 million in bribes from large corporations such as Samsung [official website]. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:22 pm
Samsung matters.) [read post]
20 May 2017, 1:38 am
We've Moved! [read post]
