Search for: "State v. Bias"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 4,612
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2008, 4:50 pm
IMMIGRATION LAW Alibasic v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:48 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 11:14 am
Mullo v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 1:04 pm
[The Rhode Island Supreme Court case cited in the briefs is State of Rhode Island v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:14 pm
As these cases show, the states’ applications of the death penalty have exposed individuals to execution who should have been protected because of their intellectual disability (Moore v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 7:25 am
., v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 2:30 am
Donson Nursing Facilities v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 2:36 pm
Meredith also made a bias claim. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:30 pm
Oracle v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:21 am
" The Appellate Division rejected Canna's claim the hearing officer was biased, holding that Canna failed to present "a factual demonstration to support the allegation of bias and proof that the outcome [of the hearing officers findings and recommendation] flowed from it. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 7:27 am
The decline of the past two years was the result of a reduction in appeals from administrative agency decisions involving the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), as well as decreases in criminal appeals and federal prisoner petitions brought about by the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 7:15 pm
See Williams v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 8:03 am
Solicitor General to provide the government's views on whether states have any authority to bar cell phone companies from listing taxes and fees as separate items on customers' monthly bills (Sprint Nextel v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 7:03 am
Schlosser PDF Swinomish Indian Tribal Community v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 2:01 am
iStock_000003589389Medium.jpg While noting general agreement that FRE 606(b) precludes inquiry into the validity of a verdict based on a juror’s testimony about racial or ethnic comments made “during the course of deliberations,†First Circuit finds the rule “cannot be applied so inflexibly as to bar juror testimony in those rare and grave cases where claims of racial or ethnic bias during jury deliberations implicate a… [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:26 am
R (on the application of Cart) (Appellant) v The Upper Tribunal (Respondent); R (on the application of MR (Pakistan)) (FC) (Appellant) v The Upper Tribunal (Immigration & Asylum Chamber) and Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) [2011] UKSC 28, 22/6/2011 – read judgment; press summary here Unappealable decisions of the Upper Tribunal are still subject to judicial review by the High Court, but only… [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:50 am
Adam Liptak reports for The New York Times that during yesterday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 7:35 am
In light of Trump v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:00 am
[McGunigle v City of Quency, USCA, First Circuit, Docket # 15-2224.] [read post]
