Search for: "State v. Browne" Results 1681 - 1700 of 8,784
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2011, 2:39 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
 In the Court’s close division and the strongly worded dissents, Brown echoes other recent Eighth Amendment cases dealing with sentencing, such as Graham v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:33 am by Michael O'Hear
 In the Court’s close division and the strongly worded dissents, Brown echoes other recent Eighth Amendment cases dealing with sentencing, such as Graham v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 2:29 pm by John Bolesta
The National Labor Relations Board has made good on its recent promise to move forward with rulemaking to re-establish the decades-old joint employer standard in place prior to the Board’s 2015 decision in Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc., d/b/a BFI Newby Island Recyclery, 362 NLRB No. 186 (2015) (Browning-Ferris or BFI), petition for review docketed Browning-Ferris Indus. of Cal. v. [read post]
The CFPB, for its part, has already published a bulletin alerting Consumer Reporting Agencies (CRAs) and other furnishers of consumer information that, as federal, state and local pandemic-related housing protections expire, the Bureau will be giving greater enforcement focus to these businesses’ compliance with accuracy and dispute obligations under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and Regulation V. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am by Mary Whisner
JohnsonThe Heirs of Brown: The Story of Grutter v. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 1:48 pm by Howard Friedman
State of Nevada ex rel Nevada Department of Corrections, (NV Sup. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 3:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Inc., 27 NY3d 46, 56 [2016]), and the negligent infliction claim does not identify any applicable duty owed by defendants (see Brown v New York Design Ctr., Inc., — AD3d &mdash, 2023 NY Slip Op 01228, *5 [1st Dept 2023]). [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The court stated that it did not need to decide whether liability existed under the prong 1 claim to dispose of the motion to dismiss, but noted that a report prepared by external counsel indicated that the company had a “woefully inadequate compliance system. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 7:58 pm
For the reasons stated below, we reverse the district court with respect to the claims against Vaughn, but affirm summary judgment in favor of Lincoln. 07a0103p.06 2007/03/16 In Re: Renato Acosta v. [read post]