Search for: "State v. City of York"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 9,060
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2019, 1:51 pm
Phillips & Associates’ employment lawyers help New York City employees and job seekers to assert their rights in claims for unlawful workplace practices under federal, state, and city law. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
Dismissed employee precluded from litigating her termination because of her failure to exhaust her administrative remediesMatter of Yan Ping Xu v New York City Dept. of Health, 2009 NY Slip Op 50147(U), Decided on January 23, 2009, Supreme Court, New York County [Not officially published]Yan Ping Xu, a New York City Research Scientist Level I, a position in the non-competitive class, was terminated from her position. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 4:37 pm
City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005) -- have posted this short video entitled "Kelo v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld a New York City “pay-to-play” law against various constitutional challenges: Ognibene v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm
Last week in Princeton University’s Workshop in Constitutional Development, Lynda Dodd, City College, City University of New York, presented on "Reconstruction and the Origins of Civil Rights," and Michael Paris, College of Staten Island, City University of New York, presented on "Derrick Bell and the Lost Cause of School Desegregation: A Reexamination. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
In Matter of Quagliata v New York City Police Department, (NY County Sup. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
"Since that branch of petition which was to compel disclosure of certain records remains undetermined in light of [the Appellate Division's] determination," the Appellate Division held that "the [Plaintiff's] request for an award of attorney's fees and litigation costs is premature (Matter of Jewish Press, Inc. v New York City Dept. of Educ., 183 AD3d 731; see Matter of McDevitt v Suffolk County, 183 AD3d at 828). [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
"Since that branch of petition which was to compel disclosure of certain records remains undetermined in light of [the Appellate Division's] determination," the Appellate Division held that "the [Plaintiff's] request for an award of attorney's fees and litigation costs is premature (Matter of Jewish Press, Inc. v New York City Dept. of Educ., 183 AD3d 731; see Matter of McDevitt v Suffolk County, 183 AD3d at 828). [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 11:33 am
The case is Simmons v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:20 am
In Myers v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 12:18 pm
New York State Urban Development Corp., and Goldstein v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 7:37 am
New York City Taxi & Limousine Comm'n, 2007 U.S. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 7:00 am
See City of New York v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 1:09 pm
Yenem Corp. v. 281 Broadway Holdings, 18 N.Y.3d 481 (N.Y. 2012) On February 14, 2012 the New York Court of Appeals held that former Administrative Code of the City of New York § 27-1031(b)(1), a municipal ordinance (“the Ordinance”), triggers strict liability for defendants who cause damage to adjoining property through excavation work. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 9:27 am
Town of Brookhaven - New York Court of Appeals (comprehensive taking plan) City of Stockton v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
An employee who alleged she was subjected to retaliation because she testified before a grand jury was not engaged in “protected activity” within the meaning of the State’s Human Rights LawClarson v City of Long Beach, 2015 NY Slip Op 07614, Appellate Division, Second Department Sandra Yu Clarson, an Asian-American woman, served as the City Comptroller for the City of Long Beach [City]. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
The New York Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide contains resources for individuals with cerebral palsy within the State of New York. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 9:20 am
Under federal, state, and New York City law, sexual harassment is generally considered a form of sex discrimination. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 7:12 am
Justice Engeron's opinion reasoned that the HAIL Act violated New York City's "home rule" powers guaranteed by Article IX of the New York Constitution, because the Act stripped the City Council of its charter powers to regulate the supply of taxi medallions. [read post]
