Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 9,084
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2006, 7:34 am
Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
The “traditional contours” test, then, may be stated as follows: If Congress did not alter the idea/expression dichotomy or the fair use defense when crafting a copyright statute, then a reviewing court faced with a First Amendment challenge to that statute does not apply heightened judicial scrutiny. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 2:06 pm
Circuit, on November 20.Today's DJ features GMSR's Alana Rotter in First High Court Ruling Considers Appeals Deadlines, about Hamer v. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am
A court in the Northern District of California in Google LLC v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:20 am
” At Fa on First, Wen Fa provides the text of his recent speech on Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 9:46 am
Supreme Court in Miller v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 4:30 am
" That standard is codified in the Official Code of Conduct rules applying to "United States circuit judges, district judges, Court of International Trade judges, Court of Federal Claims judges, bankruptcy judges, and magistrate judges. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 9:53 pm
It noted that as the Fourth Circuit stated in Miller v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 10:46 am
Parker, R (On the Application Of) v Bashir & Anor (2022) EWHC 358 (Admin) A judicial review of a Magistrates Court decision on costs in a section 82 Environmental Protection Act 1990 prosecution. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:04 am
The First District recently brought further clarity to the baseline setting rules in such contexts, as well as the public trust doctrine, in its published opinion in Citizens for East Shore Parks v. [read post]
28 Sep 2019, 11:51 am
District Court for the District of Columbia issued a national injunction in Make the Road New York v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 9:18 am
First the good: State v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 3:06 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 8:29 am
It has now been more than 12 years since the Supreme Court’s landmark opinion in United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 6:30 am
In Gabelli v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
The court otherwise affirmed, holding(1) that the Colorado Election Code permitted the respond-ents’ challenge based on Section 3; (2) that Congress neednot pass implementing legislation for disqualifications un-der Section 3 to attach; (3) that the political question doc-trine did not preclude judicial review of former PresidentTrump’s eligibility; (4) that the District Court did not abuseits discretion in admitting into evidence portions of a… [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 6:44 am
North Carolina Supreme Court Finds a Batson Violation – For the First Time Since 1986 In a 4 to 3 ruling last week, the state high court in State v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:42 pm
On appeal, Plaintiff–Appellant the United States (`Government’) argues that reversal is necessary because the district court applied the wrong legal standard in determining that Krueger established prejudice.U.S. v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:15 pm
The district court’s opinion relied heavily on the Supreme Court’s decision in a previous ACLU lawsuit, Clapper v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 6:09 am
Also, the Seventh Circuit in Winkler v. [read post]
