Search for: "State v. Quick"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 4,925
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2013, 5:31 pm
So, with that caveat, and an invitation to readers to point out anything I say that is out of date or otherwise inaccurate, here are a few quick thoughts on King. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 12:43 pm
According to a quick Lexis search, this is the first time it has been used in a judicial opinion. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:43 pm
United States, 132 S.Ct. 2492 (2012), and Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 4:15 am
See, People v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 5:36 am
Matthews v Department of Public Safety [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 2:43 pm
See, e.g., Sugawara v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 2:30 am
In line with its previous findings that damage is required for compensation, the Court states that a person affected needs to prove non-material damage (para. 50). [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 1:42 pm
State v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 6:41 am
Allen v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:32 pm
The D.C. ruling (in a case then titled Maynard v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 6:49 am
The Court of Appeals holds that the police had the right to detain a driver and his passengers while they searched the car for contraband (finding nothing) even though there was no probable cause to detain these people.The case is United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 6:49 am
First, a quick reminder as to the facts of this particular case. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 3:27 pm
However, the Enlarged BoA was quick to nip this argument in the bud. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 6:33 am
United States]. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 11:46 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 5:10 pm
Orin Kerr puzzles over Justice Sotomayor's "rather remarkable dissent from denial of certiorari in Pitre v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 11:13 am
In so doing, the Fifth Circuit rejected Molina-Martinez’s contention, based on Supreme Court dicta in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 10:01 am
The Israeli Supreme Court recently rejected a challenge to Israel’s version of this system, in a case called Adalah v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 12:39 pm
Whatever rhetorical force the argument carries, ... it overlooks the States’ legitimate interest in providing for a quick, certain death.... [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 2:12 pm
" A quick scan lead me to the conclusion that a majority of the Michigan Supreme Court (like many justices on other state supreme courts) remain eager to keep Blakely from upsetting the current state sentencing apple cart. [read post]
