Search for: "State v. Taylor "
Results 1681 - 1700
of 3,341
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2014, 3:00 am
”***In Conetta, State Supreme Court Judge Lockman suggested that if a school district wishes to stop granting tenure, it could make such a demand in the course of collective negotiations authorized by Article 14 of the Civil Service Law, the Taylor Law [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Both decisions thus relied on the Fourth Circuit’s earlier ruling in Taylor v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 7:44 pm
In this post, guest contributor Paul England (Taylor Wessing LLP) explains the legal issues and their consequences:UKIPO -- a 'court' for the purposes of the Brussels I Regulation Some courts look like this ...With Actavis v Eli Lilly [noted on the IPKat here] still fresh in our minds, and amendments to the Brussels I Regulation (recast) progressing through the European Parliament in preparation for the Unified Patent Court, jurisdictional matters are a hot… [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 8:00 am
On January 30, 2014, the Colorado Court of Appeals decided the case of Taylor Morrison of Colorado, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 7:33 am
Action resumes in State v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:28 am
(See Lawrence v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Court of Appeals deferred to PERB’s expertise with respect to its holding the employer had engaged in an improper employer practice but ruled its remedy was unreasonableTown of Islip v New York State Pub. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 6:40 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 6:08 am
Baker & Taylor In a complaint filed last year in Illinois, EEOC v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 7:17 pm
See AMF Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 4:40 am
Productions v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 am
For one thing, Louisiana is the nation’s only civil law state. [read post]
25 May 2014, 5:30 am
http://t.co/7e8CRTEkIT -> Identity not disclosed for privacy reasons DIGITAL MUSIC NEWS LLC v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 11:13 am
Strauch v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:49 pm
The judge in Gardener v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 9:27 am
Let’s review an Illinois case from a few years back, United Stationers Supply Co v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 8:05 am
Rev. 21.Caffrey, Denise, United States v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 6:36 pm
Llauget v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 9:35 am
By Dennis Crouch James Taylor v Taylor Made Plastics (Fed. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:00 am
”*** Much the same argument would apply to retirees of the State as the employer who retired prior to the effective date of the President’s Regulation as such retirees are not employees within the meaning of the Taylor Law nor did they receive any benefit with respect to job security as, like judges, retirees cannot be “laid off. [read post]
