Search for: "USA v. Majors" Results 1681 - 1700 of 1,832
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am by Howard Knopf
In the past, many have observed anecdotally and cynically that even after many years of deliberation and millions of dollars in legal and expert fees often expended, the tariff at the end of the day has often the simple arithmetical average of the amounts proposed by the proponent and opponent(s) +/– a few percent.However, that pattern, if it was ever true, has been changing and  the Board has issued some surprising and encouraging decision. in recent yearsThe Board has refused to set… [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 5:43 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
He indicated that the injuries were the major contributing cause for the treatment recommendations and functional limitations and restrictions. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:29 pm
The reasoning, thanks to Justice Blackmun's obiter dictum in Jones v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 11:21 pm
The following two statements need to be juxtaposed, with minimal comment. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 9:00 am by Eric Goldman
More SESTA-Related Posts: * Debunking Some Myths About Section 230 and Sex Trafficking (Guest Blog Post) * Congress Is About To Ruin Its Online Free Speech Masterpiece (Cross-Post) * Backpage Executives Must Face Money Laundering Charges Despite Section 230–People v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 10:51 am by Schachtman
(June 14, 1991) (presented by plaintiffs’ counsel Jim Pettit, of Greitzer & Locks), in Radcliff v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 7:04 am
  The Defenders Case Study Unlike the Major League Baseball and the National Basketball Association leagues, salaries in the NFL are not guaranteed. [15]  The likelihood of a career-ending injury is also higher in professional football based on the physical nature of the game. [16]  Under the current system, players seek pay days that generate guaranteed money, in the case that a career-ending injury is sustained. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
In short, no persuasive arguments have been mounted against the disclosure requirement.The non-disclosure advocates strangely echo the Little Sisters of the Poor (in the Zubik v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 7:54 am by Victoria Kwan
As in prior terms, the majority of the justices’ events during October Term 2016 take place in the Washington area. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
BIC USA, Inc., 136 F.Supp.2d 196, 207-208 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (Consumer Product Safety Commission) (“The CPSC regulations establish general, rudimentary and minimal requirements. [read post]