Search for: "United States v. State of Michigan" Results 1681 - 1700 of 3,229
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM. 07a0261p.06 2007/07/11 Parks v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:36 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
• Policy considerations and implications in United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:38 pm by Michael Stevens
Michigan Supreme Court     Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit 09a0021a.06  USA v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:38 pm by Michael Stevens
Michigan Supreme Court     Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit 09a0021a.06  USA v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 3:24 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Marie, have argued in federal court that the Michigan Indian Land Claims Settlement Act of 1997 allows them to buy land anywhere in the United States to build a casino, so long as the land was purchased with land claim settlement trust funds. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 7:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
However, her Title VII claim against the Assistant Secretary of State in his official capacity, as well as her Section 1983 and state law claims, were dismissed because of Eleventh Amendment immunity (Canfield v. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 4:57 am
., the Supreme Court will hear Rivera v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 7:28 am by Erin Miller
United States (09-479) and Gould v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 10:37 am by ACLU
For example, in 2020, armed protesters forced the suspension of the activities of democratically-elected state legislatures in Michigan and Oregon. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 12:54 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
United States: The case seeks to resolve a circuit split over the statutory interpretation ofthe Bank Secrecy Act, which generally requires taxpayers to report their interests in foreign bank accounts. [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:40 am by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan at Marquette. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm by John Elwood
United States, 17-5876 (Michigan’s), and Weston v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Evan Caminker
” First, the court found the first part of the test satisfied because “state-provided education is ubiquitous throughout all but the earlier days of the United States. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 5:40 am by Amy Howe
At Inter Alia, the online companion to the Yale Law and Policy Review, Brian Christopher Jones uses United States v. [read post]