Search for: "Wells v. Wise" Results 1681 - 1700 of 2,133
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2010, 8:18 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
One might well ask the same questions about CIRM's IP policy. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 5:59 am
Reg. 46,716-843 (Aug. 21, 2007)(to be codified at 37 C.F.R. pt. 1)(the "Final Rules") under his decision in Tafas v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 5:05 am
For those of you who may not have been following  Bloxham v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 2:58 pm by David Lat
One of our tipsters found it “obnoxious,” but some of the advice is wise. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 5:00 am by SHG
I hope you choose wisely. [read post]
19 Nov 2016, 4:16 am by SHG
Wise people appreciate the question, but the world isn’t made up of people who care to risk a headache. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 10:37 am by Carl Neff
This exception ensured that the rationale of the Delaware Supreme Court, in its May 2014 decision ATP Tour v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 2:33 pm
A word to the wise, though: every lawyer in Oklahoma should keep a copy of this letter in their files to use in support of a recusal motion in case they are appearing before Judge Graves in a case where they are representing one of the groups demeaned in the letter.... [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 12:31 pm
By Mike Dorf In my latest FindLaw column, I examine a recent Ninth Circuit decision, Doe #1 v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 11:08 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Trademark Office issued the following 217 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in May 2024 based on applications filed by Indiana trademark attorneys: Registration         Number           Wordmark 7377089 M MERCHANTS BANK OF INDIANA 7377091 MERCHANTS BANK OF INDIANA 7377090 M MERCHANTS BANK OF INDIANA 7383748 GUIDED PATHWAYS 7383753 GAME CHANGERS 7383747 PURPOSE FIRST 7383749 MOMENTUM PATHWAYS 7378370 KATHLEEN POST 7382555… [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 7:46 am by Harlan Cohen
The editors have also wisely included commentary chapters that can challenge the narrative. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 11:14 pm by Peter Mahler
The double curse was at work in Roy Food and Wine LLC v Meregalli, 2019 NY Slip Op 32875(U) [Sup Ct NY County Sept. 25, 2019], decided last month by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice O. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 5:17 am by Dan Zammit
Well, the recent case of MN v AN [2023], highlights how courts view prenups in the UK and promote the idea that they will uphold if certain conditions are met. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 8:20 am
Jonathan Griffiths' "Misattribution and Misrepresentation: the Claim of Reverse Passing Off has 'Paternity' Right" offers an enjoyable and imaginative interplay of English and US statute and case law, while Stina Teilmann's "It's a Wise Text that Knows its Own Father" has introduced him to some hitherto unfamiliar materials, not least of which is the French litigation in the intriguingly-named case of Garnier v Bastard… [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 2:52 pm
Justice Clarence Thomas's dissent in Virginia v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 7:06 am by Joy Waltemath
In addition, the court found that determining whether a plaintiff was subject to the FLSA exemption would require individualized, rather than representative, proof (Stevens v HMSHost Corp, August 26, 2014, Glasser, I). [read post]