Search for: "BAKER V. STATE"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 3,489
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2014, 7:27 pm
(Peter Baker, U.S. to Restore Full Relations With Cuba, Erasing a Last Trace of Cold War Hostility, The New York Times, Dec. 17, 2014).)It appeared to move to end one of the most overwrought bi-lateral disputes of the last century. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 7:00 am
” Wells Bennett linked us to an interesting little order in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:48 pm
Baker Botts, L.L.P. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 6:55 am
Wells provided a video of this week’s oral arguments in Smith v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:54 am
Baker, 440 Mass. 519 (2003). [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 8:45 am
I concluded that, as a practical matter, this procedural action in Peruta probably doesn’t mean much, because the same issue has been raised in Baker v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 3:14 am
Yesterday’s oral argument in Elonis v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
"Citing Baker v Poughkeepsie City School District, 18 NY3d 714, the court said that “[a]lthough a particular individual's involvement or participation in the disciplinary process does not automatically compel his or her recusal, the case law makes clear that "individuals who are personally or extensively involved in the disciplinary process should disqualify themselves from reviewing the recommendations of a Hearing Officer and from acting on the charges. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 10:03 am
The Arkansas decision, by Obama-appointee Kristine Baker, came in Jernigan v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 3:03 pm
BAKER CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Florida profit corporation, et al., Defendants, FORM WORKS/bAKER JV, LLC., a foreign profit corporation, Defendant-Appellee. 11th Circuit. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 6:55 am
Jane noted that the DC Circuit denied a rehearing en banc in Allaithi v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 3:09 pm
It remains one of only three decisions in federal trial courts to uphold a ban, but the judges in the other two did not address the issue directly, finding that they had no authority to consider the issue because they were bound by a one-line Supreme Court decision in 1972 (Baker v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 7:08 am
Late last year, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in R. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 7:12 am
Baker Concrete Construction, Inc., November 14, 2014, Carnes, E.). [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 3:12 pm
The state used sixteen of the twenty-one pages in its application to argue that point, including assertions that both Baker v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 8:47 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 6:55 am
Jane noted that the appellees in Klayman v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 11:04 am
It found that view reinforced by a one-sentence Supreme Court decision in 1972, Baker v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:21 am
See, e.g., Baker v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
This would appear to be a strange result (and goes against eg Case T-152/07 Lange Uren v OHIM). [read post]
