Search for: "Bingham" Results 1701 - 1720 of 1,902
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2018, 6:24 am by Tammy Binford
Michigan Michigan voters approved legalizing recreational use of marijuana, but employer policies aren’t likely to be affected, says Gary Fealk, an attorney with The Murray Law Group, P.C. in Bingham Farms, Michigan. [read post]
11 May 2007, 2:00 pm
" Bingham McCutchen wrote the similarly entitled: California Supreme Court Rules Payments for Missed Meal and Rest Periods Are Wages Subject to Three-Year Statute of Limitations, with a list of four lessons learned by employers. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:41 pm by Alasdair Henderson
Indeed, in the key case of  Middleton, as Silber J noted, Lord Bingham had said that whilst in some cases the State’s procedural obligation may be discharged by criminal proceedings “it is unlikely to be so if the defendant’s plea of guilty is accepted … or the issue at trial is the mental state of the defendant … because in such cases the wider issues will probably not be explored. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 2:00 pm
  "The cost of document review has become intolerable for everyone," according to David Balabanian, head of Bingham McCutchen's litigation group. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 6:48 am
Bingham McCutchen is also expecting to make offers at about the same rate. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 6:24 am by Tammy Binford
Michigan Michigan voters approved legalizing recreational use of marijuana, but employer policies aren’t likely to be affected, says Gary Fealk, an attorney with The Murray Law Group, P.C. in Bingham Farms, Michigan. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 8:56 am by INFORRM
For their part, they argued that there was no question of a constitutional right to trial by jury being at issue, rather it has already been recognised that there is an emphasis against trial by jury as reiterated by Lord Bingham MR in Aitken v Preston ([1997] EMLR 415). [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:07 pm by Stephen E. Sachs
True, the Dobbs Court cited and applied its modern precedents on substantive due process, and it didn't cite Madison or John Bingham every other page. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 7:49 am by Ron Coleman
What is wrong with this picture (right), featuring a product sold by the renowned Personal Care Products, Inc. company from Bingham Farms, Michigan? [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 4:51 am by Tobias Thienel
Thus, Lord Bingham of Cornhill has explained in R v Jones (Margaret) [2006] UKHL 16, [2006] 2 WLR 772, at para. 30, in a passage that could have been tailored to the present case:'Resolution of the charge would (...) call for a decision on the culpability in going to war either of Her Majesty's Government or a foreign government, or perhaps both if the states had gone to war as allies. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 8:46 pm
” (p.24) (quoting Bingham) e) Rights that “are not and cannot be fully defined in their entire extent and precise nature. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 11:56 am by Legal Beagle
And it does not enjoy the sovereignty of the Crown in Parliament that, as Lord Bingham said in  Jackson, para 9, is the bedrock of the British constitution. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:09 am by INFORRM
In balancing these two rights, Tugendhat J had in mind the “ultimate balancing test” as referred to by Lord Steyn Re S (A Child) [2005] 1 AC 593 (at para 17) and guidance from Lord Bingham in R v Shayler [2003] 1 AC 247 (at para 26) that interference of the ECHR right must not be stricter than necessary to achieve the state’s legitimate aim. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:00 am by Jan Dalhuisen
  Lord Denning and Lord Bingham remained activist equity judges and thought that equity was not “beyond the age of child bearing”, but the equity practice is now much more subdued in England and the general attitude is indeed to wait instead for legislation, one reason why it is sometimes said that English law is now closer to the European than the American tradition. [read post]
11 May 2009, 8:01 am
"There is a huge amount of thought that goes into this," says Bingham McCutchen chairman Jay Zimmerman. [read post]
Professor Weisberg is a three-time winner of the law school’s John Bingham Hurlbut Award for Excellence in Teaching. [read post]
3 May 2018, 8:10 am by Dave
  The cases he considered were not exactly compelling, but, as Lord Bingham said in ex p Sheldrake, the various judicial glosses expressing the restriction on s. 3 (“such an interpretation would be incompatible with the underlying thrust of the legislation, or would not go with the grain of it, or would call for legislative deliberation, or would change the substance of a provision completely, or would remove its pith and substance, or would violate a cardinal principle of the… [read post]