Search for: "Commitment of J F" Results 1701 - 1720 of 1,900
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2010, 10:56 am
(j) "Investor" shall mean, with respect to a health care provider, a person with a financial relationship with the health care provider, subject to the exceptions provided in paragraph (b) of subdivision three, subdivision four and paragraph (b) of subdivision five of section 238(a) of the Public Health Law. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 1:09 pm by Shannon Hill
Expanding the Internet of Things: Four Key Legal IssuesOctober 2020 By David Verhey Verhey is Partner with Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig in Washington DC office. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 6:00 am by Steven Peck
Nielsen declared, "I have never assaulted or threatened to assault [Bookout], and I have never committed any physical or emotional harm against her. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
This paper, which updates several key components of our January 2019 tax conformity paper,[1] examines how states have approached provisions closely tied to the competitiveness and neutrality of the tax code, including taxation of GILTI, provision of the deduction for Foreign-Derived Intangible Income (FDII), inclusion of income deemed repatriated under § 965, the first-year expensing of short-lived capital investment under § 168(k), and the § 163(j) net interest limitation. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
Under the National Labor Relations Act, the National Labor Relations Board issues, prosecutes, and adjudicates complaints alleging that employers committed unfair labor practices. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 12:30 am by Jeff Gamso
., 531 N.W.2d 32, 29–30, 35 (Wis. 1995); see also Coonrad, 362 N.W.2d at 201 (Schultz, J., concurring). [read post]
NORTHWEST AUSTIN MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1, ETAL.; from Travis County; 3rd district (03-04-00240-CV, 274 SW3d 820, 11-14-08, pet. denied Sep. 2009) 2 petition motion to amend petition for review denied ("allocation agreement" under section 54.016(f) of the Texas Water Code)09-0248DEWAYNE FUNDERBURK, AS NEXT FRIEND OF WHITNEY FUNDERBURK v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:56 am by Kathy Kapusta
Fort Bend County, June 20, 2018, Elrod, J.). 6th Cir.: CBAs clear; no lifetime healthcare benefits for Honeywell retirees. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 2:28 am by Orin S. Kerr
"); Chatrie (App.), 107 F.4th at 353 (Wynn, J., dissenting) ("[A] [geofence] warrant is uncomfortably akin to the sort of 'reviled' general warrants used by English authorities that the Framers intended the Fourth Amendment to forbid. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) released a Proposed Statement of Policy on Bank Merger Transactions (the Proposal) that outlines the FDIC’s views on its jurisdiction and expectations with respect to each statutory factor under the Bank Merger Act (BMA). [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 2:50 pm by Josh H. Escovedo
Student-athletes should report NIL activities consistent with state law or school and conference requirements to their school.[25] While enabling student-athletes to benefit from their NIL, the policy preserves the NCAA’s commitment to avoid pay-for-play and improper inducements associated with choosing to attend a particular institution by maintaining its rules to that effect.[26] The NCAA also issued a NIL question and answer document, offering additional guidance concerning the… [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:32 am by centerforartlaw
Atreya Mathur In an ongoing legal dispute between Yuga Labs, the creator of the Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) NFT collection, and the artist Ripps, on April 21, 2023, Central District Court of California has issued a ruling in favor of Yuga’s motion for summary judgment, addressing various legal facets within the context of non-fungible tokens (NFTs). [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm by Steve Bainbridge
In discussing how companies are using delaying tactics to stall hostile takeover bids (a subject for another day), Steven Davidoff opines: The trick is for courts to prevent this manipulation from depriving shareholders of the ultimate choice of when to sell the company. [read post]