Search for: "Doe 103" Results 1701 - 1720 of 3,234
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2013, 3:37 pm by Randy Barnett
” Special protection does not, however, ineluctably mean absolute immunity. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 1:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  There is a conceptual claim made in the photography cases: the creativity of the photo does not interact with the creativity of the sculpture. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 7:36 pm
§§ 102 or 103.My two cents:The Board analyzed the rejections of claims 8-12 under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 4:08 am
The Decision Finding - after much analysis that the two laws directly CONFLICT - decision came down to this - the "general" parole revocation law - section 17-2- 103(11)(b)(IV) does not apply to Colorado Sex Offender Parole (the parole board to revoke his parole for a maximum of 180 days), while the more "specific" law 17-22.5-403(8)(b) does. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 10:04 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The appellant won on 101 and 112 P 2, but lost on 103 in Ex parte RileyThe claim in question23. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 5:11 pm by Adam Levitin
Similarly, Chapter 9 does not incorporate the priority scheme of sections 726/725/507 nor does it incorporate that priority scheme indirectly via section 1129(a)(7). [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am by Larry Catá Backer
But this alternative does not so much displace as extend conventional constitutional theory as a set of static premises that structure the organization of legitimate governance units. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 8:37 pm
The Board found the swear-behind to be insufficient and affirmed the § 103 rejection on this basis. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
On appeal to the CAFC, the third party requester (Plasmart) questioned the Board’s application of the law (103 case law, KSR) to reverse the rejection of the examiner, arguing that the Board failed to account for a “common sense view of the references” as mandated by KSR. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 10:56 pm by James Hamilton
On the one hand, she does not believe that mandatory audit firm rotation would enhance auditor independence, but on the other hand she does not believe that Congress should micromanage the PCAOB. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 9:00 pm by Karel Frielink
Net equity may not be or become negative From the legal point of view in Curaçao, share premium (’agio’) forms part of the company’s free reserves (Curaçao law does not provide for statutory reserves), and does not qualify as share capital. [read post]