Search for: "Doe v. Holder" Results 1701 - 1720 of 6,694
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2017, 5:35 am by Jim Singer
Enterprise Railway Equipment Company, the Supreme Court said that Section 287 does not limit damages if the patent holder isn’t actually making articles to mark. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 10:34 am by Sean Wajert
But the designation of a drug as an RLD does not change the manufacturer's status as an Amended New Drug Application ("ANDA'') holder,  the RLD designation does nothing to alter an ANDA holder's duties concerning labeling changes. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:34 am
Does the possibility of forfeiture of domain names substantially empower the rights holders? [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 1:28 am by Jani Ihalainen
This writer is woefully behind the times in writing about this decision, but it does merit belated discussion and is a very important decision to keep in mind in relation to intermediaries.The case of Frank Peterson v Google LLC (along with another case; Elsevier v Cyando) concerns Nemo Studio, a company owned by Mr Peterson who is a music producer. [read post]