Search for: "Does 1 - 29" Results 1701 - 1720 of 13,846
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2016, 9:11 am by News Desk
” For questions and concerns, email teasafety@republicoftea.com or call 1-800-298-4832, Monday through Friday, between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 1:34 pm by Barbara S. Mishkin
  The amendments made by Senate Bill 3491A become effective March 29, 2019. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 8:34 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
“[T]he possibility of drawing two inconsistent conclusions from the evidence does not prevent an administrative agency’s finding from being supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 7:35 pm by Howard Friedman
Late last night, the New York state Senate voted 33-29 in favor of A8354, the bill passed earlier this month by the state Assembly legalizing same-sex marriage. [read post]
On 29 June 2021, the FCA published Policy Statement 21/6: Implementation of Investment Firms Prudential Regime (PS21/6). [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 1:34 pm by Barbara S. Mishkin
  The amendments made by Senate Bill 3491A become effective March 29, 2019. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 9:42 am by Brian D. Pedrow
Pedrow On June 29, 2016, BancorpSouth Bank announced a proposed settlement and consent order with the CFPB and the U.S. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 8:03 am by Wolfgang Demino
So, Crum reasons, because (1) there was no rescission and (2) HSBC sued on September 29, 2014, see Doc. 1, Compl., well after its legal right to do so was supposedly extinguished, its suit must be dismissed. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:28 am by SHG
The January 29 letter tells Doe that he is the subject of “an investigation concerning allegations of sexual misconduct that occurred in December 2014, in Frederick Hall. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 2:45 am by Jessica Kroeze
The first examiner indicated that in his opinion claim 1 now on file suffers from the same deficiency as claim 1 as originally filed. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 4:46 am
On the contrary, the comparison must be made by examining each of the marks in question as a whole, which does not mean that the overall impression conveyed to the relevant public by a composite trade mark may not, in certain circumstances, be dominated by one or more of its components (see order in Matratzen Concord v OHIM, paragraph 32; Medion, paragraph 29).42 As the Advocate General pointed out ..., it is only if all the other components of the mark are negligible that the… [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm by Kevin Mullally and Andrea Rossi
For regulators, although the behavior we document does not appear to be technically illegal, it does seem to conflict with the SEC’s stated goal of providing investors with transparency and a clear measure of the value a fund creates. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 8:38 am by Eugene Volokh
But a court decision allowing pseudonymity on these grounds sends a clear message: The legal system does not approve of the community's attitudes. [read post]