Search for: "Does 1-88" Results 1701 - 1720 of 2,128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2019, 4:09 am by Peter Mahler
In the leading New York case, Marx v Akers, 88 NY2d 189 [1996], the Court of Appeals noted criticism of what it called Aronson‘s “reasonable doubt threshold of Delaware’s two-fold approach to demand futility” and formulated its own three-part standard: (1) Demand is excused because of futility when a complaint alleges with particularity that a majority of the board of directors is interested in the challenged transaction. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
 Buckingham Palace has written to IPSO complaining of a violation of clause 1 of the Editors’ Code. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 1:38 pm by WIMS
EPA requiring the issuance of final standards [See WIMS 1/21/11], U.S. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 1:34 pm by Stu Ellis
• So what does the El Nino report mean? [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:28 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Since 1985, the team with the home-field advantage has won 23 of 29 World Series.[1] The home field advantage extends beyond Major League Baseball. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am by John Mikhail
Only a misconception of the scope of federal power can result from ignoring this fact, or from assuming that this aspect of our fundamental law does not exist. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
In so doing, they ensure their identity does not detract from their work skills. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am by John Elwood
American Atheists  (relisted after the 9/26 and 10/7 Conferences) Docket:  10-1276 Issue(s):  (1) Which Establishment Clause test should be applied when analyzing passive public displays; (2) does the Establishment Clause forbid roadside memorial crosses marking the site of death for state highway troopers killed in the line of duty; and (3) is a collection of memorials owned by a private organization, disclaimed by the state, and located on both private and public… [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am by John Elwood
American Atheists  (relisted after the 9/26 and 10/7 Conferences) Docket:  10-1276 Issue(s):  (1) Which Establishment Clause test should be applied when analyzing passive public displays; (2) does the Establishment Clause forbid roadside memorial crosses marking the site of death for state highway troopers killed in the line of duty; and (3) is a collection of memorials owned by a private organization, disclaimed by the state, and located on both private and public… [read post]
29 May 2016, 10:52 am by Giles Peaker
Following R (Savage) v Hillingdon LBC [2010] EWHC 88 (Admin), it was not necessary for a housing needs assessment to be a separate exercise to a s.184 decision (or a s.202), if the assessment could be implied in that decision. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The Supreme Court has had the occasion to consider when a contract of adhesion is unconscionable.[1] In doing so the Court asserts its ability to apply equitable considerations in cases of unconscionable contracts and should bring caution to the minds of all contract drafters so that their terms are communicated better and onerous terms or outcomes are brought to the attention of the vulnerable party. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm by Bexis
 . and does not play an integral and vital part in the overall production or marketing of [products]”); Shepard v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:08 pm by Arthur F. Coon
 1) held the San Diego County Board of Supervisors committed a prejudicial abuse of discretion in granting project opponents’ appeals of the Planning Commission’s decision upholding County’s use of the CEQA Guidelines section 15183 exemption for a construction debris and inert materials recycling facility project. [read post]