Search for: "Edwards v State"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 4,363
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2019, 5:40 am
Edwards on behalf of the late Arthur Watkins v Hugh James Ford Simey Solicitors, heard 25 Jul 2019. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 7:43 am
Mr Murray held he was bound by the decision in Meguerditchian v Lightbound [1917] 2 KB 298 and the Court of Appeal decision in Gavin Edmondson Solicitors Ltd v Haven Insurance Co Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 1230 that held a lien does not arise where compensation is obtained without the need to issue proceedings. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 8:31 pm
Gore may have few defenders in legal academia, but one of that small band who defend the decision is Professor Edward Foley at Ohio State University, Moritz College of Law. [read post]
27 May 2008, 2:45 pm
Did Judge Edwards correctly note a distinction between alleged "technical defects" in an assignment versus no assignment at all? [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 10:29 am
This is in response to the CJEU case of Maximiliam Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner, which declared invalid the previous agreement called Safe Harbor (our take on the case here). [read post]
28 Jul 2004, 12:35 pm
Dec. 17, 1997); United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 7:06 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 7:05 am
Fisher v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:41 pm
NOTE TO READERS: In a poll taken last month for the Boston-based Edward M. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
In this setting, states and cities argue that the anti-commandeering principle prevents the feds from requiring state and local authorities to affirmatively provide information about or access to individuals who may have committed immigration law violations.Perhaps the most important Supreme Court case on this point is Printz v. [read post]
22 Mar 2006, 5:21 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Keller,… [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Keller,… [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:00 pm
Edwards, 415 U.S. 800, 802-803 (1974) and United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 10:09 am
See Holmes v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 8:20 am
The law in this regard was summarised by Arnold J in Jarden Consumer Solutions (Europe) Ltd v SEB SA [2014] EWHC 445 (Pat) at [103]: “[103] As Kitchin LJ and Sir Robin Jacob said in their joint judgment in Gedeon Richter plc v Bayer Pharma AG[2012] EWCA Civ 235, [2013] Bus LR D17 at [61], ‘it is trite law that… the older (from the priority date of a patent under attack) a piece of prior art said to render a patent obvious, the harder it is to show… [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:03 am
Edwards Mims v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 12:40 pm
State v. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 6:35 am
In his opinion in State of New Mexico v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 2:35 am
The case before the justices—Caniglia v. [read post]
