Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 1701 - 1720 of 20,068
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2017, 5:49 am by Staci Zaretsky
The firm has launched an internal investigation into the matter. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 10:12 am by John Enser
This introduced the UK's private copying exception, as contemplated by Article 5(2)(b) of the Copyright Directive (2001/29/EC). [read post]
2 May 2024, 12:22 pm by Kaufman Dolowich
” The Brill court explained that “[t]he only distinction between 1) a directed verdict at the end of plaintiff’s case pursuant to Rule 4:37–2(b), 2) a directed […] The post Is Summary Judgement Dead? [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 5:34 am
"From "'Not Our Tragedy': the Taliban Are Coming Back, and America Is Still Leaving/President Biden made it very clear this week that we’re out of Afghanistan, no matter what" by Susan B. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 8:48 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Gary Kleypas, No. 101,724 (Crawford)Direct appeal; capital murder and death sentenceSarah Ellen Johnson, Meryl B. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 6:12 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
§ 102(b) as anticipated by Parodi. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 10:39 am by Dennis Crouch
A disclosure [in a prior-filed patent application] shall not be prior art to a claimed invention under subsection (a)(2) if … [T]he subject matter disclosed and the claimed invention, not later than the effective filing date of the claimed invention, were owned by the same person or subject to an obligation of assignment to the same person. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 1:25 pm
The district court dismissed Paulsson’s claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), concluding it did not have subject matter jurisdiction to issue a remedy because the Alberta Act vested exclusive jurisdiction in the Court of the Queen’s Bench of Alberta. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 4:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Also, it was a §43(a)(1)(B) claim, as preserved by Dastar. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 1:02 pm
Supposing you are the executor of a will of someone who has died, intend to apply for a grant of probate of the will, but someone else has the original will, but won’t give it to you. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 7:02 am by Paul Rosenzweig
Kasowitz's reported advice to the White House staff to a) not discuss the matter and b) more significantly, that they did not yet need private attorneys of their own was precisely the sort of advice prohibited by the Rule. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:34 am by Bexis
  In short, it's a form of class certification intended to apply to requests for injunctions or declarations.What Rule 23(b)(2) isn't supposed to be about is money damages. [read post]