Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 9,183
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 10:59 am
Ed. 2d 497 (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:56 am
* No More (Trade Mark) Trouble With Harry (Winston) Marie-Andrée recounts the melting tale of the Winston family, where Harry built up a worldwide famous jewellery company in 1932 which now tries to prevent his son Bruce from registering his own name and surname as a trade mark for jewellery with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:21 pm
” United Mine Workers v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 6:16 am
Nearly ten years ago, in 2013, the United Nations adopted a resolution designating July 30 as World Day Against Trafficking in Persons. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:06 am
Ireland and the United Kingdom both submitted third-party comments in TV Vest v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 9:05 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
| Hospira v Genetech Mark 1, the Appeal | [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 3:57 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 11:32 am
” The question before the Court is “[w]hether a final judgment in favor of the United States in an action brought under Section 1346(b)(1) of the Federal Tort Claims Act, on the ground that a private person would not be liable to the claimant under state tort law for the injuries alleged, bars a claim under Bivens v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 2:30 am
The Respondent in Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. ll, FA1007001336979 (Nat. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 2:49 am
("HCI") sought a concurrent use registration for the mark HANSCOMB CONSULTING & Design (shown below) for various business services, covering the entire United States except for two geographical areas (Hinsdale, Illinois and Los Angeles, California). [read post]
28 May 2018, 3:01 pm
” To establish priority of use, a party must show that its owns a mark or trade name previously used in the United States and not abandoned. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 2:37 pm
In Case C-228/03 Gillette Co v LA-Laboratories Ltd Oy, the CJEU stated that use that does not create an impression of commercial connection or take unfair advantage of the earlier mark’s distinctive character or repute will be considered honest practice. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 4:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 12:29 am
Today is rumoured to be National Bilski Day in the United States (if you've never heard of Bernard L. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 11:20 am
U.S. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 6:47 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 7:16 am
In a 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit addressed this issue in Rescuecom Corp. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:04 am
In a 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit addressed this issue in Rescuecom Corp. v. [read post]
